2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00355.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The First Quarter Century of the GASB (1984–2009): A Perspective on Standard Setting (Part One)

Abstract: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (hereafter GASB or Board) was established in April 1984 as the authoritative accounting standard‐setting body for United States state and local governmental entities. There are over 87,000 state and local entities in the country, and for the most part these entities are required to comply with the generally accepted accounting principles established by the GASB; hence, the work of the GASB is significant. On 30 June 2009, the GASB completed its twenty‐fifth year of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Katselas et al (2011) use content analysis to examine international firm lobbying activities. Roybark et al (2012a, 2012b) use a historical research methodology to study the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Katselas et al (2011) use content analysis to examine international firm lobbying activities. Roybark et al (2012a, 2012b) use a historical research methodology to study the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an independent, private sector organization that "develops and issues accounting standards through a transparent and inclusive process (italics added)" (GASB.org, 2017). Established in 1984, the GASB enjoyed widespread general acceptance for most of its first quarter century (Roybark et al, 2012a); however, in 2007-2008 its service efforts and accomplishments (SEA) project ignited extreme opposition from professional groups (Roybark et al, 2012b). More recently, a GASB due process document proposing the inclusion of financial projections within governmental financial statements again caused an uproar among some GASB constituents (DePaul, 2012;Quigley, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%