2021
DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.10.201071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first Russian multicenter non-interventional registry study to study the incidence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in Russian Federation

Abstract: Aim. To assess the incidence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among the adult population living in the regions of the Russian Federation located at latitudes from 45 to 70. Materials and methods. Russian multicenter non-interventional registry study using the "cross-sectional" method. Results. In this study, 72.1% of the examined have the status of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency, while an adequate level was diagnosed in 27.8% of cases. When assessing the degree of vitamin D deficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing data on vitamin D status among the Russian population is available for small populations of limited generalizability, due to a recent monograph edited by Kodentsova 17 , epidemiological studies which run in frame of dietary intake monitoring from 2012 to 2017 represented by several groups: children and adolescents (7–14 years; n = 790), students (Arkhangelsk; n = 58), pregnant female (Moscow; n = 100), etc. Despite these limitations, findings are generally consistent in that 50–91% of the working-age population has reduced vitamin D concentrations (< 30 ng/mL) regardless of age, sex and season of data collection 18 . Systematic assessments of the indigenous population of the Russia north also exhibit high levels of sub-optimal vitamin D concentrations 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Existing data on vitamin D status among the Russian population is available for small populations of limited generalizability, due to a recent monograph edited by Kodentsova 17 , epidemiological studies which run in frame of dietary intake monitoring from 2012 to 2017 represented by several groups: children and adolescents (7–14 years; n = 790), students (Arkhangelsk; n = 58), pregnant female (Moscow; n = 100), etc. Despite these limitations, findings are generally consistent in that 50–91% of the working-age population has reduced vitamin D concentrations (< 30 ng/mL) regardless of age, sex and season of data collection 18 . Systematic assessments of the indigenous population of the Russia north also exhibit high levels of sub-optimal vitamin D concentrations 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The general trends indicated lower concentrations of vitamin D in men, regardless of season and age. In women, the lowest vitamin D content is observed in old age, regardless of the season of the year [53][54][55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First of all, our study further supported the prevalence of very low vitamin D levels in patients with COVID-19. The median level of 25OH-D 3 in COVID-19 patients was only 10.8 ng/mL, which corresponds to a pronounced vitamin D deficiency in a major part of the examined patients [ 41 ] and depicts worse vitamin D status than epidemiological data from a similar season [ 44 ]. Similar results have been demonstrated in a number of previous studies from various countries [ 45 ], and the amount of evidence continues to increase [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%