2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first step towards intelligent wire arc additive manufacturing: An automatic bead modelling system using machine learning through industrial information integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Xia et al, (2020aXia et al, ( , 2020b achieve bead width control by adjusting wire feed rates via a real-time modelbased controller with the feedback of bead width. Ding et al (2021) developed an automatic system based on machine learning technologies to control multiple welding parameters to improve geometric accuracy of deposited components. Although many approaches have improved the accuracy of deposited bead geometry in simple deposition tasks, they provide limited control performance in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xia et al, (2020aXia et al, ( , 2020b achieve bead width control by adjusting wire feed rates via a real-time modelbased controller with the feedback of bead width. Ding et al (2021) developed an automatic system based on machine learning technologies to control multiple welding parameters to improve geometric accuracy of deposited components. Although many approaches have improved the accuracy of deposited bead geometry in simple deposition tasks, they provide limited control performance in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many approaches have improved the accuracy of deposited bead geometry in simple deposition tasks, they provide limited control performance in practical applications. For example, although control of bead geometry has been demonstrated through mathematical modelling, this often comes at the expense of relatively long processing times and a requirement for large sets of training data to set up the model properly (Ding et al, 2021). In comparison, a real-time control strategy can feature reduced training costs, however, the control accuracy is then limited by reaction speeds and system latency (Abe et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the best candidates are selected following regression analysis of the experimentally determined quality parameters [3], [4]. Alternatively, datadriven modeling using neural networks [5], [6] or support vector machines [7] has been proposed to relate process inputs to quality parameters. All these approaches require a large number of samples, to either achieve good predictive capabilities, or to reliably cover all possible process variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 An automated bead modeling tool was proposed using a Support vector regression model algorithm using Machine learning. 17 Layer-wise weld pool conditions are predicted using hybrid deep learning models with convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN). 18,19 Layer-wise computed tomography (CT) with a high-resolution camera such as digital-single-lens-reflex (DSLR) is used to detect the defects like voids, cracks, discontinuities, porosity, and incomplete fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%