2008
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/690/1/163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The First Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope GRB Afterglow Catalog

Abstract: We present the first Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) gammaray burst (GRB) afterglow catalog. The catalog contains data from over 64, 000 independent UVOT image observations of 229 GRBs first detected by Swift, the High Energy Transient Explorer 2 (HETE2), the INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL), and the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The catalog covers GRBs occurring during the period from 2005 Jan 17 to 2007 Jun 16 and includes ∼ 86% of the bursts detected by the Swift Burst … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
111
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the dust distribution which is based on Kann et al (2010), Schady et al (2007Schady et al ( , 2010 and Greiner et al (2011) is probably heavily skewed towards low dust environments. It hence rather resembles the sight lines towards bright and mildly extinguished afterglows as typically detected in the UV/optical range (Kann et al 2006;Schady et al 2007;Roming et al 2009). The redshift distribution is chosen to peak at the redshift interval where most of the Swift bursts originate from (z ∼ 1−4, Fynbo et al 2009), but includes a significant number of ultra-high redshift GRBs (∼1000 at z > 8) to investigate the application of photometric redshifts at these extreme values.…”
Section: Properties Of the Afterglow Mock Samplementioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the dust distribution which is based on Kann et al (2010), Schady et al (2007Schady et al ( , 2010 and Greiner et al (2011) is probably heavily skewed towards low dust environments. It hence rather resembles the sight lines towards bright and mildly extinguished afterglows as typically detected in the UV/optical range (Kann et al 2006;Schady et al 2007;Roming et al 2009). The redshift distribution is chosen to peak at the redshift interval where most of the Swift bursts originate from (z ∼ 1−4, Fynbo et al 2009), but includes a significant number of ultra-high redshift GRBs (∼1000 at z > 8) to investigate the application of photometric redshifts at these extreme values.…”
Section: Properties Of the Afterglow Mock Samplementioning
confidence: 56%
“…For GRB afterglows Swift/UVOT and GROND offer the natural data source as both instruments systematically follow-up on GRB triggers and nicely complement each others sensitivity and wavelength coverage. UVOT onboard the Swift satellite is a 30 cm space-based telescope primarily sensitive in the ultraviolet (UV) and optical range using uvw2, uvm2, uvw1, u, b, v filters, that starts observing the GRB field as quickly as ∼40 s after the trigger (Roming et al 2009). Additional optical and near-infrared (NIR) response is provided by GROND, a seven channel imager (g , r , i , z , J, H, K s simultaneously) mounted at the 2.2 m MPI/ESO telescope at the ESO/LaSilla observatory.…”
Section: Filters and Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Counts have been extracted in a 5 radius of aperture, and magnitudes and fluxes have been evaluated using uvotmaghist, V. 1.1. The correction for Galactic extinction has been done following Roming et al (2009), assuming E B−V = 0.104 and 0.224 for case A and B respectively, where E B−V is the difference of the total extinction in the B and V filters. The evaluation of E B−V has been done using N H = 7.79 and 16.79 × 10 20 cm −2 , for case A and B, respectively, and N H /E B−V = 7.5 × 10 21 cm −2 , as given in Jenkins & Savage (1974).…”
Section: Swift/uvotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UVOT repository (Roming et al 2009) gives a detailed sequence of observation times, as each of the UBV filters was used, and more than the initial 9 × 10 s exposure were taken. The time error bars in Fig.…”
Section: Other Optical Data and Upper Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%