2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2008.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first tridecanuclear nickel(II) cluster: [Ni13(OH)6(O2CMe)8(btaO)12(H2O)6(nPrOH)4] (btaOH=1-hydroxybenzotriazole)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This case has been documented by previous work , and indicates strong antiferromagnetic exchange coupling among the Ni 9 cluster . Upon decreasing the temperature, the χ M T value declines almost linearly to 3.63 cm 3 K mol –1 at 55 K, also indicative of the existence of a dominant antiferromagnetic exchange coupling. , The further decrease in temperature witnesses a slight increase of χ M T value to 3.74 cm 3 K mol –1 at 16 K, which may contribute to the presence of weak intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction , and spin frustration . Below 16 K, the χ M T value declines rapidly to 2.75 cm 3 K mol –1 at 2 K, suggesting the presence of intermolecular antiferromagnetic interactions.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This case has been documented by previous work , and indicates strong antiferromagnetic exchange coupling among the Ni 9 cluster . Upon decreasing the temperature, the χ M T value declines almost linearly to 3.63 cm 3 K mol –1 at 55 K, also indicative of the existence of a dominant antiferromagnetic exchange coupling. , The further decrease in temperature witnesses a slight increase of χ M T value to 3.74 cm 3 K mol –1 at 16 K, which may contribute to the presence of weak intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction , and spin frustration . Below 16 K, the χ M T value declines rapidly to 2.75 cm 3 K mol –1 at 2 K, suggesting the presence of intermolecular antiferromagnetic interactions.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…35,36 The further decrease in temperature witnesses a slight increase of χ M T value to 3.74 cm 3 K mol −1 at 16 K, which may contribute to the presence of weak intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction 37,38 and spin frustration. 39 Below 16 K, the χ M T value declines rapidly to 2.75 cm 3 K mol −1 at 2 K, suggesting the presence of intermolecular antiferromagnetic interactions. Unfortunately, because of the complexity in molecular structure, it is unrealistic to fit the experimental magnetic data of this two-dimensional heteropolymetallic spin system using a suitable theoretical model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%