2011
DOI: 10.1080/10420940.2011.552579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fish Swimming TraceUndichnafrom the Mississippian Mauch Chunk Formation, Eastern Pennsylvania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of Pennsylvania Fillmore et al, 2012). The Moroccan and North American tracks match in size as well as the shape and orientation of digits.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeoichnologymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of Pennsylvania Fillmore et al, 2012). The Moroccan and North American tracks match in size as well as the shape and orientation of digits.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeoichnologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Manual tracks of Hylopus are digitigrade or semidigitigrade and have long, thin, curved digits of varied lengths. Pedal tracks of the same ichnogenus are plantigrade and have shorter, more equal-length digits than the manus imprints (Fillmore et al, 2012). Accordingly, we interpret CDUE 267, 268, and 292 as manual tracks assigning them tentatively to cf.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeoichnologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…-Modern revision of Undichna was done by Trewin (2000) and Minter & Braddy (2006). Recently, Fillmore et al (2011) contributed by further comments. Our understanding to the trace follows these papers.…”
Section: Ichnogenus Undichna Anderson 1976mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hylopus was considered monospecific with the only valid ichnospecies being Hylopus hardingi Dawson 1882. Hylopus variabilis was not considered in the revision by Fillmore et al (2012), presumably as it was considered a nomen dubium by Abel (1935) and in the Treatise (Häntzschel 1975). In their emended diagnosis, Fillmore et al (2012, p. 58) described Hylopus as follows:…”
Section: Ichnotaxonomic Assessment Of Hylopus Variabilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logan's specimen was not given much attention until it was named and described as Hylopus hardingi by Dawson (1882). Fillmore et al (2012) revised the diagnosis of Hylopus, in the process reviewing all three known ichnospecies of that genus. Hylopus was considered monospecific with the only valid ichnospecies being Hylopus hardingi Dawson 1882.…”
Section: Ichnotaxonomic Assessment Of Hylopus Variabilismentioning
confidence: 99%