2018
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2018.2796721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FIT-MoM Hybrid Method for Analysis of Electromagnetic Scattering by Dielectric Bodies of Revolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximate method includes: Kirchhoff Approximation Method [7,8], Phase Perturbation Method, Small Perturbation Method, Small Slop Approximation, and Physical Optical Method [9][10][11] , etc. Approximation method is simple to model, fast to calculate and less computation consume, but their calculation results are often not accurate enough, now people are paying more and more attention on the numerical method such as the MOM method, fast multilevel method, finite element method, FDTD and forward-backward method [12][13][14][15] ,etc. The numerical method is less efficient than approximate method in terms of calculation, but its calculation accuracy is higher,and the obtained result is more universal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximate method includes: Kirchhoff Approximation Method [7,8], Phase Perturbation Method, Small Perturbation Method, Small Slop Approximation, and Physical Optical Method [9][10][11] , etc. Approximation method is simple to model, fast to calculate and less computation consume, but their calculation results are often not accurate enough, now people are paying more and more attention on the numerical method such as the MOM method, fast multilevel method, finite element method, FDTD and forward-backward method [12][13][14][15] ,etc. The numerical method is less efficient than approximate method in terms of calculation, but its calculation accuracy is higher,and the obtained result is more universal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical methods allow, without significant expenditures of materials and time, the simulation of EM wave scattering from UAVs of various shapes and materials and for various radar-probing scenarios. Here, the most widely used are asymptotic high-frequency methods (AHFMs) [13][14][15][16][17][18] (in the case of electrically large scatterers) and methods based on solving boundary integral equations (IEs) [3,8,14,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] (in the case of electrically small and resonant-size scatterers).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for mathematical modelling of their radar scattering, it is reasonable to use methods based on the boundary IE. Note that IEs of EM scattering are usually solved using method of moments (MoM) [3,8,14,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], which belongs to the class of projection methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, there are two classical methods proposed in Yuan et al 12 and Ye et al, 13 respectively. In Yuan et al, 12 the MOM method 14 combined with circuit‐based method is used for the EMI analysis of penetrated wire terminated with PCB circuit in shielded cavity. Unfortunately, this method is just a frequency domain algorithm, and the structure of penetrated wire should be meshed directly when using MOM method to extract the equivalent circuit model of penetrated wire as excitation source of inner PCB circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%