The fit of competitive strategies and firm-specific advantages with country-specific advantages in explaining manufacturing location choices

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to clarify the fit of competitive strategies and firm-specific advantages (FSAs) with country-specific advantages (CSAs) in explaining manufacturing location choices at product category level in the European automotive industry. Design/methodology/approach Seven hypotheses are formulated and tested using binomial logistic regression with data from 148 passenger car models (i.e. product category level) that are sold in Europe and manufactured in countries that offer CSAs of either cost advantages or differentiation advantages. The first four hypotheses test manufacturing location choices of product categories pursuing cost leadership strategy, differentiation strategy, focus strategy and hybrid strategy. The other three hypotheses test whether FSAs of R&D capability, marketing capability and operations capability will impact on the manufacturing location choice. The tests control for the type of passenger cars as well as the manufacturer’s region of origin. Findings While pursuing cost leadership strategy leads to manufacturing in countries that offer cost advantages, pursuing differentiation strategy as well as strong R&D capability and marketing capability result in manufacturing in countries that offer differentiation advantages. Focus strategy, hybrid strategy and operations capability do not have an impact on the manufacturing location choice at product category level. Research limitations/implications Conducting empirical research at product category level is subject to limitations in the choices of FSAs due to lack of availability of data. Practical implications Managers should assess the competitive strategies and FSAs of their product categories and then decide about manufacturing locations based on their fit with host country CSAs. Policymakers should understand the CSAs of their countries and target to attract manufacturing FDI from product categories with matching competitive strategies and FSAs. Originality/value The research contributes to discussions in explaining manufacturing location choices. Its originality lies in being the first study to test the fit of competitive strategies and FSAs of product categories with CSAs.

Mediating role of manufacturing strategy in the competitive strategy and firm performance: evidence from SMEs

“…According to Ilmudeen and Bao (2020), the evolving competitive landscape has compelled businesses to understand BIJ 29,10 manufacturing strategies thoroughly. Recently, Akpinar (2020) pointed out the importance of selecting an appropriate manufacturing strategy since its role changes according to economic, technological, and demand conditions, competitors' strengths and weaknesses and product lifecycle. In this vein, several cohort studies have demonstrated that prioritising manufacturing strategy is critical, resulting in improved performance and increasing the company's competitiveness (Ahmad and Schroeder, 2011;Hill and Hill, 2009;Baack and Boggs, 2008).…”

Geographic market size and low bid competitiveness in construction companies

“…See, for example, Chen (2008) on the factors of activity in international markets. See also Garnett and Pickrell (2010) on the reality of international mergers and Akpinar (2020) on the perspective of advantages in the choice of manufacturing locations.…”

Environmental sustainability and reshoring in the automotive industry: a multiple cases study

“…Much of the extant literature is only dealing with the what and why (Akpinar, 2020;Pavlínek, 2020;Dachs et al, 2019;Wan et al, 2019;Engström et al, 2018;Ketokivi et al, 2017).…”

“…Much of the growing body of literature on reshoring relates to the manufacturing industry, but not necessarily to OEMs or AS. However, ten studies are published that cover the automotive industry over a period from 2013 to 2020 and examine competitive strategies to explain manufacturing location decisions (Akpinar, 2020), global production networks (Pavlínek, 2018), international production relocation or re-insourcing as a manufacturing-strategic option (Lampón et al, 2017). The seven remaining studies relate to Lund & Steen (2020), Pavlínek (2020), Moradlou et al (2017), Ocicka (2016), Bailey & De Propris (2014), Drauz (2014 and Schmitt & Van Biesebroeck (2013).…”

“…In addition, this thesis contributes to the discussion of reshoring and ES by employing a qualitative study with multiple cases. Recent studies are particularly focusing on reshoring in certain countries or niche industries conducting investigations on the what and why (Akpinar, 2020;Pavlínek, 2020;Dachs et al, 2019;Wan et al, 2019;Engström et al, 2018;Ketokivi et al, 2017). This thesis serves an in-depth sectoral analysis focusing on the how, why and which impact of reshoring and ES.…”