2017
DOI: 10.1002/cpns.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Five‐Choice Continuous Performance Task (5C‐CPT): A Cross‐Species Relevant Paradigm for Assessment of Vigilance and Response Inhibition in Rodents

Abstract: Deficits in the domains of attention and response inhibition are central to many psychiatric disorders. As such, animal models of disorders purporting to replicate these behavioral deficits first require tests that can accurately assess the behaviors with high fidelity. The gold-standard clinical test of attention and response inhibition is the continuous performance test (CPT). Although there are a number of CPTs, all share the premise of responding to target stimuli and inhibiting from responding to non-targ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Food (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) and water were available ad libitum except during training and testing. In food reinforced experiments, food was restricted to maintain mice at~85% full body weight as is common [40][41][42]. All mice were maintained in an animal facility that meets all federal and state requirements for animal care and was approved by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) and water were available ad libitum except during training and testing. In food reinforced experiments, food was restricted to maintain mice at~85% full body weight as is common [40][41][42]. All mice were maintained in an animal facility that meets all federal and state requirements for animal care and was approved by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When first training rats in the 5-to-1 target-to-non-target stimuli task, it was observed they did not differentiate target from non-target trials, responding to all stimuli (Barnes et al, 2012), in contrast with mice (Young et al, 2009). Hence, training in a 2-to-1 ratio was first required to make the non-target stimuli more salient and is recommended for use (Cope and Young, 2017). …”
Section: Methodological Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol involves habituation to the testing chambers, fixed-ratio reward habituation, and then fixed-ratio response training. Once responding reliably, rodents are trained to respond to single target stimuli and inhibit from responding to non-target stimuli (Cope and Young, 2017). Once fully trained, rodents can then be challenged in various conditions to assess different cognitive control processes (e.g., distractibility; Young et al, 2011), described in detail in Cope et al, (2016a), with further details below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcome variables include the responsivity index (RI) to represent bias of responding, as well as accuracy (the proportion of correct responses to incorrect responses), latencies to correct target responses (mean correct latency, MCL), total trials, the % of omitted trials, and the % of premature responses representing motoric impulsivity/temporal discrimination (Cope et al 2016). The calculation for each variable is thoroughly described elsewhere (Cope and Young 2016). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%