2023
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond

Mark Ziemann,
Pierre Poulain,
Anusuiya Bora

Abstract: Computational reproducibility is a simple premise in theory, but is difficult to achieve in practice. Building upon past efforts and proposals to maximize reproducibility and rigor in bioinformatics, we present a framework called the five pillars of reproducible computational research. These include (1) literate programming, (2) code version control and sharing, (3) compute environment control, (4) persistent data sharing and (5) documentation. These practices will ensure that computational research work can b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 133 publications
(133 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
Computational reproducibility is the ability to obtain consistent results using the same input data, computational steps, methods, and code from a previous study (Goodman et al, 2016;Ziemann et al, 2023). It plays an important role in science because it: (1) ensures the credibility of scientific results; (2) improves the understanding of complex analytical workflows; (3) promotes knowledge sharing; and (4) allows the saving of research funds (Alston & Rick, 2021).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Computational reproducibility is the ability to obtain consistent results using the same input data, computational steps, methods, and code from a previous study (Goodman et al, 2016;Ziemann et al, 2023). It plays an important role in science because it: (1) ensures the credibility of scientific results; (2) improves the understanding of complex analytical workflows; (3) promotes knowledge sharing; and (4) allows the saving of research funds (Alston & Rick, 2021).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%