2012
DOI: 10.1007/bf03325265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females

Abstract: The FTSST is a valid measure of dynamic balance and functional mobility in older adults. The high ICC and low SEM and SEM% suggest excellent relative and absolute reliability and reproducibility of the FTSST in older adults. Change in FTSST performance should exceed 2.5 seconds to be considered real change beyond measurement error.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
150
3
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
150
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-rater reliability ICC as well as inter-rater reliability ICC of the TUG are excellent [30]. The test is deemed to be a valid measure of dynamic balance and functional control in older adults [31]. This test will be repeated two times if possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-rater reliability ICC as well as inter-rater reliability ICC of the TUG are excellent [30]. The test is deemed to be a valid measure of dynamic balance and functional control in older adults [31]. This test will be repeated two times if possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five times sit-to-stand test is a test of dynamic balance [4] and measures the time it takes to stand from and sit in a chair five times [56]. This test has high test-retest reliability (0.81) [4] and has shown to be correlated with other tests of dynamic balance (r = 0.64) [11]. Each participant was seated in a standard chair (height 46 cm) and instructed to transfer to a standing position and return to a sitting position as quickly as possible five times.…”
Section: Functional Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-retest reliability of FTSST in adults 22 and in subjects with neurological disorders 11 as well as intra- 14 and inter-rater 3,16,23 reliabilities have shown good to high intra class correlation values (ICC). Concurrent validity of FTSST when compared to muscular strength, 14,15 walking speed, 17 walking endurance 20 and different balance tests 3,15,24,25 has, irrespective of patient group, been demonstrated to be moderate. A clinically significant change of FTSST performance, excluding measurement error, has been estimated to be 2.5 seconds in older females 24 and to be i2.3 seconds in persons with or without balance disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Concurrent validity of FTSST when compared to muscular strength, 14,15 walking speed, 17 walking endurance 20 and different balance tests 3,15,24,25 has, irrespective of patient group, been demonstrated to be moderate. A clinically significant change of FTSST performance, excluding measurement error, has been estimated to be 2.5 seconds in older females 24 and to be i2.3 seconds in persons with or without balance disorders. 17 Cut-off points for the test's ability to discriminate between subjects with or without balance impairments have been shown to be 10 seconds in young adults and 14.2 seconds in the elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%