The Five Whys Method: A Tool for Developing Problem Definitions in Collaboration with Children

Abstract

Participatory action research with young people (yPAR) involves youth and adults in a collaborative process of research, reflection, analysis and action. An important part of the research cycle is the identification of a problem definition. Yet, there is relatively little research addressing the process of how young people develop a problem definition on which to focus their analysis and intervention and what methods might exist to facilitate this process. This article draws upon a yPAR project with fifth‐grade working‐class young people, primarily young people of colour, to demonstrate how the Five Whys method for reflecting on lived experiences facilitated the development of problem definitions in line with second‐order change. The Five Whys method, when used within a participatory framework, offers both a context and a structure for young people to critically examine social problems they identify and to seek out root causes. The article highlights changes in the participant's formulation of problems in the context of using the Five Whys method, from a primarily individual level of analysis to a more structural level of analysis. It also outlines the subsequent changes in proposed actions to address the identified problems. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Applying the Psychology of Working Theory for Transformative Career Education

“…Through simulation activities, students had the opportunity to experience and analyze the impact of economic constraints in reaching their goals and in applying available resources to remedy identified social problems. Consistent with the problem posing pedagogy, Socratic questioning techniques and repeated levels of questioning (Kohfeldt & Langhout, 2012) were utilized to foster deeper levels of analysis. We also sought to guide students in a critical analysis of the changing world of work by presenting them with data on the jobs with the most anticipated growth and those that are decreasing most rapidly.…”

Towards a liberatory ethics of care framework for organizing social change

“…project. The program intended to create an empowering setting to facilitate critical inquiry and youth-directed social change (Kohfeldt & Langhout, 2012). The school hosting the program is located in the central coastal region of California, and serves primarily low-income and Latinx students.…”

Student Voice for School‐Climate Improvement: A Case Study of an Urban Middle School

“…Another, related consideration in using a youth organizing process to effect school climate change with middle school students is their capacity for understanding the complexities of public school systems. Recent research with elementary and middle school‐aged youth provides evidence for their ability to diagnose structural causes of problems in their school lives (Foster‐Fishman, Law, Lichty, & Aoun, ; Kohfeldt & Langhout, ; Langhout, Kohfeldt, & Ellison, ). However, despite the iterative, Socratic nature of the problem identification process used during SVP team meetings, students tended to eschew institutional explanations for problems in favor of individual student behaviour.…”

“…For example, if a team member indicated disruptive student classroom behaviour as an obstacle to learning, the team as a whole was posed the question, ‘why do students act that way in class?’ This cycle of questioning was repeated until students felt that they had exhausted explanations. Similar problem identification procedures have been used in participatory action research initiatives with children (Kohfeldt & Langhout, ).…”