2017
DOI: 10.1080/21698252.2017.1417687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flesh and the bones of cohesive devices: towards a comprehensive model

Abstract: Building on a 1976 model of cohesive devices, this article probes the literature on these linguistic tools with the aim of generating a comprehensive model of cohesion that can be used as an instrument for textual analysis across different text types. This article addresses two main questions: (1) what are the linguistic tools that can be incorporated into the 1976-model of cohesive devices in the creation of an operational model? and (2) what would such a comprehensive model of cohesive devices look like? The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards substitution, they were confused about using correct substitutions and misunderstood the usages of substitutions. Substitutions are one of the patterns of native English ways in writing (Abu-Ayyash & McKenny, 2017). For Indonesian students who use English as a foreign language, using substitutions is of course challenging because their mental language is constructed from a combination between Indonesian and English mental languages.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As regards substitution, they were confused about using correct substitutions and misunderstood the usages of substitutions. Substitutions are one of the patterns of native English ways in writing (Abu-Ayyash & McKenny, 2017). For Indonesian students who use English as a foreign language, using substitutions is of course challenging because their mental language is constructed from a combination between Indonesian and English mental languages.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohesion means "unity" (Manser & McGauran, 2003). In this case, cohesion refers to the unity of meanings within a text or discourse (Abu-Ayyash & McKenny, 2017). Cohesion is categorized as an element of discourse, wherein discourse itself refers to the biggest umbrella context of on-going written communication (Ahmed, 2010).…”
Section: Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation