1989
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(89)90115-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flipped SU(5)×U(1) string model revamped

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
711
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 459 publications
(723 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
711
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…(z k |e 1,2,3,4,5,6 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} for k = 1 or/and k = 2. In this case the gauge group enhancement includes several possibilities, depending on the (b 1 |z k ) we can obtain: ( Depending on the separate enhancements of SO(8) k for k = 1, 2 we can obtain for example:…”
Section: The Four Dimensional Gauge Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(z k |e 1,2,3,4,5,6 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} for k = 1 or/and k = 2. In this case the gauge group enhancement includes several possibilities, depending on the (b 1 |z k ) we can obtain: ( Depending on the separate enhancements of SO(8) k for k = 1, 2 we can obtain for example:…”
Section: The Four Dimensional Gauge Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also generate all other τ B -invariant curves, so the most general τ B -invariant class η ∈ H 2 (dP 3 , Z) is a linear combination 5) for some arbitrary integer coefficients m j to be determined imposing the requirements summarized in section 2.7. The first Chern class c 1 (dP 3 ) reads, in terms of the M j ,…”
Section: Vacua Over the Del Pezzo Surface Dpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized, however, that the heterotic string in itself does not guarantee the preservation of the SO (10) embedding and indeed many quasirealistic models have been constructed that do not maintain the SO (10) embedding [4]. A class of realistic string models that do preserve the SO (10) embedding are the free fermionic heterotic string models [5]. In these three generation models the SO (10) symmetry is broken to one of its subgroups by utilizing Wilson line symmetry breaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[69], and of analogous results obtained for the free fermionic formulation of string theory [70] (for applications based on this formulation, see e.g., Ref. [71], [30], [31] and [72]), that grand unification occurs, through symmetries like E 6 , SO(10) or SU(5), only in some higher dimension (d > 4), and that the breaking of the unification gauge symmetry to some lower symmetry containing the standard model gauge group as well as doublet-triplet splitting occurs in the process of compactification. More specifically the latter two phenomena take place through either (a) Wilson lines [69], or (b) orbifolds [73] (for an incomplete list of recent attempts based on orbifold compactification, see e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Conventional Versus Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…More specifically the latter two phenomena take place through either (a) Wilson lines [69], or (b) orbifolds [73] (for an incomplete list of recent attempts based on orbifold compactification, see e.g., Refs. [74,75,76,77,79,80,81]), or (c) essentially equivalently by a set of boundary conditions together with the associated GSO projections for the free fermionic formulation (see e.g., [30,31,71,72]), or (d) discrete symmetries operating in higher dimensions [82].…”
Section: Conventional Versus Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%