The Fluoride Ion Release from Ion-Releasing Dental Materials after Surface Loading by Topical Treatment with Sodium Fluoride Gel

Kelić, Marija; Kilić, Domagoj; Kelić, Katarina; Šutej, Ivana; Par, Matej; Peroš, Kristina; Tarle, Zrinka

doi:10.3390/jfb14020102

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, Wang et al examined the effects of coating on initial F release from resinmodified GIC 49) . Furthermore, Kelić et al reported that the presence of a dental adhesive system or GIC coating significantly reduced the recharge capacity compared to uncoated materials 50) . In contrast to previous findings, Tay et al proposed that adhesives could act as permeable membranes and aid in remineralizing tooth structure, halting the caries process 51) .…”

Section: Qualitative Study and Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

TUYGUNOV,

KHAIRUNNISA,

YAHYA

et al. 2024

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review investigates whether the release of calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) ions significantly affect bioactivity properties to allow for further intervention in modified GIC powder manufacture and increase remineralization properties under in vitro conditions. Researchers have explored modifying dental materials with Ca and phosphate-based chemical compounds to promote the release of Ca, P and F ions [21][22][23][24][25] . Skrtic et al. 23) found that incorporating a Ca phosphate-based compound can potentially remineralize carious enamel lesions. Assessing the addition of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) to GICs, Mazzaoui et al. and Al Zraikat et al. found that modifying 3% or 5% of CPP-ACP leads to significantly decreased F release, but increased Ca and P ion release 21,22) .Another study showed that modifying 1.56% (w/w) CPP-ACP into a GIC increases mechanical properties and releases Ca, P and F ions 22) . Modifying GIC with nanohydroxyapatite, a biologically active Ca, P mineral, resulted in positive enhancements in mechanical characteristics, antibacterial properties, ion release, and reduction of microleakage and cytotoxicity 26) . Replacing CaO and CaF2 in GIC with strontium substitutions (SrO and SrF2) increased radiopacity and F ion release 25) .Nonetheless, according to other definitions that prioritize the ability of materials to promote remineralization, GIC is not commonly considered bioactive. These definitions that characterize a substance as bioactive indicate that it has the ability to generate a material layer, like apatite, which is intrinsic and compatible with the human body [27][28][29][30] . Regarding this topic, materials are generally considered bioactive if

show abstract

Section: Qualitative Study and Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

TUYGUNOV,

KHAIRUNNISA,

YAHYA

et al. 2024

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Enhancing mechanical strength of Sr-based oxyfluoride glasses in glass ionomer cement through phase separation

Teimoory,

Rezaie,

Yekta

et al. 2024

Ceramics International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elemental analysis and micromorphological patterns of tooth/restoration interface of three ion-releasing class V restorations

Sarhan,

Mehesen,

Hamama

et al. 2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate and compare the ion-releasing capability of three different restorative systems at the restoration/tooth interface elemental analysis using energy-dispersive X-ray technique. Additionally, micromorphological patterns of the restoration/tooth interfaces was investigated. Materials and methods Eighteen freshly extracted sound human premolars were collected for the study. The premolars were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n = 6) based on the type of restorative materials used: Giomer (Beautifill II), ion-releasing composite (Activa Presto), and RMGI (Riva Light Cure). Half of the specimens in each group were tested after 24 h (the “immediate group”), while the remaining half were tested after 6 months of storage in deionized water (the “delayed group”). Standardized box-shaped cavities along the cervical area of teeth crowns and restored them with the assigned restorative material following manufacturers’ instructions. The specimens were sectioned buccolingually into 2 halves. One half of each specimen was subjected to elemental analysis using energy-dispersive X-ray technique (EDX), while the remaining half was sputter coated and underwent micromorphological analysis of the restoration/tooth interface using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data from elemental analysis test were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. Results The two-way ANOVA test showed significant differences in both phosphorus and calcium levels among the tested restorative systems (p < 0.05). In the immediate subgroup, RMGI recorded the highest phosphorus level (0.1527), followed by the ion-releasing composite (0.1172), while Giomer exhibited the least levels (0.0326) (p < 0.05). The ion-releasing composite group had the highest calcium level (0.2797), followed by RMGI (0.248), and Giomer (0.2385) respectively (p < 0.05). In the delayed subgroups, Giomer recorded the highest phosphorus level (0.1526), followed by the ion-releasing composite (0.1058), and RMGI group (0.0466) respectively (p < 0.05). RMGI had the highest calcium level (0.2801), followed by the ion-releasing composite (0.2659), and Giomer had the lowest level (0.1792) (p < 0.05). The micromorphological analysis of the restoration/tooth interfaces showed good adaptation between the composite and tooth substrate in different restorative groups. Conclusions The ion-releasing capability of the three restorative systems appears to be comparable. The rate of mineral release and diffusion is affected by time and composition.

show abstract

The Fluoride Ion Release from Ion-Releasing Dental Materials after Surface Loading by Topical Treatment with Sodium Fluoride Gel

Cited by 5 publications

References 36 publications

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

Enhancing mechanical strength of Sr-based oxyfluoride glasses in glass ionomer cement through phase separation

Elemental analysis and micromorphological patterns of tooth/restoration interface of three ion-releasing class V restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About