2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
83
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This N400 component also responded to norm violation, but it was observed only for Chinese. Previous work has shown that the frontal N400 might be functionally distinct from the central-parietal N400 (25). In particular, the frontal N400 is implicated in the evaluation of the appropriateness of different human actions, such as the meaning of hand postures (26), appropriateness of tool use (27), and semantic anticipation of action sequences (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This N400 component also responded to norm violation, but it was observed only for Chinese. Previous work has shown that the frontal N400 might be functionally distinct from the central-parietal N400 (25). In particular, the frontal N400 is implicated in the evaluation of the appropriateness of different human actions, such as the meaning of hand postures (26), appropriateness of tool use (27), and semantic anticipation of action sequences (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the left IFG, as one of the possible generators of the mid-frontal old/new effect (see Bridger, Bader, Kriukova, Unger, & Mecklinger, 2012, for a discussion), is involved in assessing the increment in familiarity relative to a pre-experimental baseline as it was suggested for the mid-frontal old/new effect (Bridger et al, 2014;Stenberg et al, 2009). Consistent with this notion, studies relating this region to familiarity used pre-existing single items (Aly et al, 2011;Angel et al, 2013;Yonelinas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Familiarity-related Regions Activated In the Definition Groupmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mid-frontal effect was more pronounced for recognized old items and falsely recognized lures than for correctly rejected lures. Assuming that the mid-frontal old/new effect reflects familiarity as opposed to recollection (for discussion see Bridger et al (2012) and Voss and Federmeier (2011)), this suggests that some lures were recognized on this basis. Poorer performers also showed larger mid-frontal effects for old hits than better performers.…”
Section: Mid-frontal Old/new Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%