1991
DOI: 10.5860/crl_52_04_352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Focus Group Interview: A Method for Assessing Users' Evaluation of Library Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bloor et al (2001, p. 42) note: "Group interviews are rarely to be preferred to individual interviews in academic social research as individual differences in viewpoint within the group will be blurred and underreported". In group interviews, it is important that the interviewer is able to work with different personalities, making sure that no one dominates the group interview and that everybody's views and opinions are expressed (Widdows et al, 1991). Both interviewers had experience in leading and moderating group conversations and ensured that everyone was able to express their opinions by specifically asking participants to elaborate when necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bloor et al (2001, p. 42) note: "Group interviews are rarely to be preferred to individual interviews in academic social research as individual differences in viewpoint within the group will be blurred and underreported". In group interviews, it is important that the interviewer is able to work with different personalities, making sure that no one dominates the group interview and that everybody's views and opinions are expressed (Widdows et al, 1991). Both interviewers had experience in leading and moderating group conversations and ensured that everyone was able to express their opinions by specifically asking participants to elaborate when necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose focus groups as our data collection method to bring together first semester transfer students in small groups to encourage interaction between the participants, with the intention that the students would share their stories and comment on each other's experiences (Glitz, 1997;Von Seggern & Young, 2003;Widdows, Hensler, & Wyncott, 1991). We conducted focus groups in both Fall and Spring semesters to capture any differences in the overall experiences transfer students had depending on which semester they entered the college.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding numerous articles on the methodology of focus groups within a library environment (e.g. Widdows et al, 1991;Glitz, 1997;Glitz et al, 2001), and extensive coverage within the general research literature (e.g. MacDougall, 2001), the limitations of this method for evidence based practice should be recognised.…”
Section: Andrew Booth and Anne Bricementioning
confidence: 99%