1957
DOI: 10.2307/1747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Food of Some Freshwater Cyclopoid Copepods and its Ecological Significance

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Animal Ecology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
136
0
4

Year Published

1972
1972
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
136
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Meili et al (1996) also attributed the difference between the ␦ 15 N of the two grazers to separate primary food sources rather than to a trophic interaction. Further elevation of ␦ 15 N in C. abyssorum from Loch Ness was consistent with the omnivorous nature of this species and its predatory relationship with E. gracilis (Fryer 1957). Because the ␦ 15 N of B. longimanus was constantly above TL3 during the summer, copepods may then have been contributing a small proportion to a diet primarily of daphnids, although in experiments to examine the effect of Bythotrephes on zooplankton densities, neither cyclopoid nor calanoid copepod biomass was depleted (Wahlström and Westman 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Meili et al (1996) also attributed the difference between the ␦ 15 N of the two grazers to separate primary food sources rather than to a trophic interaction. Further elevation of ␦ 15 N in C. abyssorum from Loch Ness was consistent with the omnivorous nature of this species and its predatory relationship with E. gracilis (Fryer 1957). Because the ␦ 15 N of B. longimanus was constantly above TL3 during the summer, copepods may then have been contributing a small proportion to a diet primarily of daphnids, although in experiments to examine the effect of Bythotrephes on zooplankton densities, neither cyclopoid nor calanoid copepod biomass was depleted (Wahlström and Westman 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Thus, there was also likely to be an element of recycling of zooplankton exuviae and excreta. A further potentially confusing factor arises from the simultaneous presence of differing life stages of the same organism, because naupliar, copepodite, and adult stages can exhibit different feeding strategies at a microscale (Fryer 1998). Kankaala (1988) deduced from in situ grazing experiments that while algae are the principal food of adult Daphnia longispina in small humic lakes, bacterial productivity was important to the juveniles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Predacious cyclopoids are particularly effective at eliminating newly emerged Aedes larvae from large water-storage containers and wells, and because of their broad diet, consisting of algae, protozoa, and rotifers, they do not depend on a continuous supply of mosquito larvae to maintain their numbers. 2,3 In addition, in Vietnam, the corixid bug Micronecta quadristrigata Bredd. and fish also contribute to the control of Aedes larvae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obs.). Some cyclopoid copepods also feed mainly on algae, but others prey on small invertebrates, such as protozoans, rotifers, copepod nauplii, and copepodids, cladocerans, and dipteran larvae (Fryer 1957).…”
Section: The Large Branchiopodamentioning
confidence: 99%