2023
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2101042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Lb Protease Cleaves Intracellular Transcription Factors STAT1 and STAT2 to Antagonize IFN-β–Induced Signaling

Abstract: Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is the causative agent of foot-and-mouth disease, one of the most highly infectious animal viruses throughout the world. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway is a highly conserved pathway for IFN-β–induced antiviral gene expression. Previous studies have shown that FMDV can strongly suppress the innate immune response. Moreover, although STAT1 and STAT2 (STAT1/2) have been well established in JAK-STAT signaling–induced antiviral gene expression, whether FMDV proteins inhibit IFN-β… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the interactions between Lb pro and TRAF3 and MDA5, and between 3A and MAVS, MDA5 and RIG-I, already shown in a human model, were confirmed from their bovine versions for the first ones, and from bovine and porcine versions for the three others [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. The same is true for the 3C–MDA5, 3C–NEMO, Lb pro –STAT1/2 and Lab pro –IRF7 interactions, which were already demonstrated using porcine proteins and which were found in both the screenings carried out within this study using the porcine and bovine libraries [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. While the interaction described between Lab pro and swine IRF3 was not found using its bovine version, bovine IRF3 was identified as interacting with the alternative leader protein form Lb pro [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, the interactions between Lb pro and TRAF3 and MDA5, and between 3A and MAVS, MDA5 and RIG-I, already shown in a human model, were confirmed from their bovine versions for the first ones, and from bovine and porcine versions for the three others [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. The same is true for the 3C–MDA5, 3C–NEMO, Lb pro –STAT1/2 and Lab pro –IRF7 interactions, which were already demonstrated using porcine proteins and which were found in both the screenings carried out within this study using the porcine and bovine libraries [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. While the interaction described between Lab pro and swine IRF3 was not found using its bovine version, bovine IRF3 was identified as interacting with the alternative leader protein form Lb pro [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although IFNAR1 has relatively weak ligand binding a nity, it initiates intracellular signal cascades and provides docking sites for signal transducers and transcriptional activators. Upon stimulation by IFNα, heterodimers of STAT1 and STAT2 migrate to the nucleus, where they induce the expression of ISGs [45][46][47]. Blocking IFNAR or using IFNAR-/-mice abolishes the antitumor effect of F1/F3 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%