2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The footprint of cometary dust analogues – II. Morphology as a tracer of tensile strength and application to dust collection by the Rosetta spacecraft

Abstract: The structure of cometary dust is a tracer of growth processes in the formation of planetesimals. Instrumentation on board the Rosetta mission to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko captured dust particles and analysed them in situ. However, these deposits are a product of a collision within the instrument. We conducted laboratory experiments with cometary dust analogues, simulating the collection process by Rosetta instruments (specifically COSIMA, MIDAS). In Paper I we reported that velocity is a key driver in d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the wide variation in the D/H ratios in particles of the R type casts some doubt upon this idea; the mean D/H for type R particles is within 1.2 σ of the mean D/H of every other particle type. A lack of variation is understandable if the different particle types do not result mainly from a difference in composition, but rather are due to a difference in a particle's initial size and incident speed, as laboratory simulations suggest (Ellerbroek et al 2017(Ellerbroek et al , 2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the wide variation in the D/H ratios in particles of the R type casts some doubt upon this idea; the mean D/H for type R particles is within 1.2 σ of the mean D/H of every other particle type. A lack of variation is understandable if the different particle types do not result mainly from a difference in composition, but rather are due to a difference in a particle's initial size and incident speed, as laboratory simulations suggest (Ellerbroek et al 2017(Ellerbroek et al , 2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COSIMA might have collected particles from one or two potential families, one with a fractal dimension of 2.5-3 and a spread in impact velocity, and the other <2 if all particles impacts with the same velocity . A large fraction of the dust entering COSIMA is reflected, owing to a mass transfer efficiency estimated to 1 to 10% depending on size and velocity of incoming particles (Ellerbroek et al 2019). This potential collection bias of COSIMA based on a collection or detection area suggests that a fractionation of the dust populations might be applicable.…”
Section: Production Rates and Mass Loss Of Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%