2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Force Required to Detach a Rotating Particle from a Liquid–Fluid Interface

Abstract: The force required to detach a particle from a liquid–fluid interface is a direct measure of the capillary adhesion between the particle and the interface. Analytical expressions for the detachment force are available but are limited to nonrotating particles. In this work, we derive analytical expressions for the force required to detach a rotating spherical particle from a liquid–fluid interface. Our theory predicts that the rotation reduces the detachment force when there is a finite contact angle hysteresis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The film thickness between the beads and the interface can be calculated by balancing the weight of the beads with the electrostatic repulsive forces between the beads and interface. , For the air/water interface, this film thickness should vary with μbot size and is estimated to be ∼50–60 nm. Supporting this, we observe no evidence of capillary interactions under normal experimental conditions. , Without added surfactant, however, beads do become pinned at the interface. Once bound, surface tension forces dominate any magnetic forces preventing paddlebots from reorienting out of the interfacial plane and translating. The system can be further characterized by the Bond number Bo = Δ ρgL 2 /γ where Δρ is the density difference between the water and the beads, g is the acceleration due to gravity, L is the diameter of an individual bead, and γ is the surface tension of water at experimental surfactant concentrations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The film thickness between the beads and the interface can be calculated by balancing the weight of the beads with the electrostatic repulsive forces between the beads and interface. , For the air/water interface, this film thickness should vary with μbot size and is estimated to be ∼50–60 nm. Supporting this, we observe no evidence of capillary interactions under normal experimental conditions. , Without added surfactant, however, beads do become pinned at the interface. Once bound, surface tension forces dominate any magnetic forces preventing paddlebots from reorienting out of the interfacial plane and translating. The system can be further characterized by the Bond number Bo = Δ ρgL 2 /γ where Δρ is the density difference between the water and the beads, g is the acceleration due to gravity, L is the diameter of an individual bead, and γ is the surface tension of water at experimental surfactant concentrations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This also had an impact on the force required to detach rotating particles from a liquid interface, with a decrease of around 25% compared with nonrotating particles. [61] Similarly, a threshold torque for the yielding of silica particle rods in saline water was discovered using optical tweezer experiments [62]. As the capillary force should create even stronger particle contacts, this hindrance is likely the cause of rigid body movement that occurs when deforming capillary networks, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Nonideal Wettingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[6] This pinning effect due to contact angle hysteresis was also recently shown to enhance the capillary torque of a capillary bridge between a particle and a liquid-liquid interface. [35,36] Therefore, Wenzel wetting might be preferred over Cassie-Baxter wetting to create the most stable capillary suspensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%