The forgotten half? Women in the forest management and development discourse in Africa: A review

Abstract

Numerous theoretical and empirical studies examining women's engagement in sustainable forest management (SFM) have shown that women bring distinctive interests and values to forest management. However, their effective engagement is still low due to bottlenecks such as rules of entry, ownership, labor division, social norms, perceptions, rules of practice, personal endowments, institutional outcomes, and other organizational cultures. Key among those are the gendered perceptions that marginalize them from the onset. As a result, women's potential to promote SFM in Africa has not been exploited effectively, yet. This raises concerns for gender and social equity as the current practice socially excludes groups that hold specific ecological knowledge, skills, and interests that influence SFM practices. By critically reviewing systematically selected 104 studies conducted on gender issues and forest management in Africa, this paper explores how women's role in forest management and the broader development discourse is constrained. It also characterizes the prevailing engagement models and shows how they influence inclusive processes of deploying SFM practices. Women's engagement in SFM is dominated by public/civic engagement and significantly lags in effectively engaging them as stakeholders, experts, or households. Of the 104 studies reviewed, 54% (n = 57) characterized women's engagement as largely through public meetings compared to 5% (n = 5) as stakeholders and 4% (n = 4) as experts. Thirty-four percent (n = 36) did not clearly categorize the engagement type. Women's engagement in SFM is merely to fill the gender ‘representation' requirements and any effective roles such as decision making, ownership, and benefits are not under the control of women at large. As a result, women's potential to promote forest management and avert ongoing forest loss is not exploited. There is a need to transition from mere representation to a meaningful engagement of women in the sector for inclusive forest management to flourish. In general, capturing, recognizing, and effectively utilizing women's voices and potential in forest management and development discourse requires institutions that deliberately embrace inclusivity and promote equity in general and across gender.

How Women’s Empowerment Contributes to Climate Change and Natural Resource Management Outcomes

“…Women tend to have fewer opportunities than men to participate in decision making about community forests and forest resources (Larson et al, 2015, p. 45). Women's ability to participate in forest management varies depending on context, but is often constrained by social norms to exclude substantive decision-making, ownership, and benefits (Duguma et al, 2022). It has been observed that having a 'critical mass' of women involved in community forest management groups, possibly through gender quotas or mandates, can make a significant difference (Canpolat et al, 2022, p. 25;Larson et al, 2015, p. 45).…”

Mobilizing participatory approaches to introduce transdisciplinary research elements when exploring the interface of commodity crop production and food security in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…This is particularly important for participatory approaches in local settings, which can be characterized by complex community dynamics, pre-existing social conflicts, or certain gender norms (see also Section 4.1.2). For example, reflecting the large body of literature showing that women and men engage differently with landscapes and commodity crop chains in many parts of rural SSA (e.g., Fonjong, 2008;Kiptop, 2015;Tantoh et al, 2021;Duguma et al, 2022) and that women might feel reluctant to be vocal in mixed gender groups, we divided local participatory approaches such as FGDs and participatory mapping by gender. Furthermore, language selection was a very important consideration in local participatory approaches and needed to be thought very well to avoid creating preconditions for exclusion, especially in areas that have very unique dialects.…”