2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1875372811020077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation features of landscapes in the Inderskii salt-dome area (Precaspian Hollow)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S. S. Korobov and I. K. Polenov [6] single out a number of factors, that contribute to karst development over the Inder uplift:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…S. S. Korobov and I. K. Polenov [6] single out a number of factors, that contribute to karst development over the Inder uplift:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation of secondary (karst-tectogenic) cap rock is associated with the wet postglacial epochs, and also with the leaching by sea water during the Caspian transgressions periods. The cap rock formation process led to the formation of various minerals, including unique: vitchite, gergeyite, hydroboracite, inderborite, inyoite, colemanite, kurnakovite, sulphoborite [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That is when these parameters are larger than an order of magnitude compared to the subgrade structure size, the roadbed will be destabilized. And when these parameters are smaller than an order of magnitude compared to the subgrade structure size, the effects could be negligible [6]. When there is not much karst under the roadbed, its roof is thicker and the rock is hard and complete, which does not affect driving safety, it is generally not handled.…”
Section: The Scale Effect Of Karst Formmentioning
confidence: 99%