1999
DOI: 10.2307/2667056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Formation of Breakaway Organizations: Observations and a Process Model

Abstract: Seijtsfor their encouragement and helpful remarks on earlier versions of this paper. Special thanks to Keith Murnighan for his insights and encouragement in guiding this manuscript through a complex review process. Thanks also to our research assistants Mary Reimer and Julie Derksen and to our anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The faultline framework is based on an intuitively powerful idea of group splits being inherently conflictual and detrimental, yet recent empirical findings in this area have been relatively inconsistent; groups with faultlines can suffer (e.g., Earley and Mosakowski 2000, Dyck and Starke 1999, Li and Hambrick 2005 as well as benefit from faultlines (Gibson and Vermeulen 2003, Hart and Van Vugt 2006, Lau and Murnighan 2005. In this study, we examined how different faultline bases (social category and information-based faultlines) may have different effects on group outcomes Consistent with Lau and Murnighan's (1998) model of faultlines and intragroup processes, we found that the strength of social category faultlines was negatively associated with group performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The faultline framework is based on an intuitively powerful idea of group splits being inherently conflictual and detrimental, yet recent empirical findings in this area have been relatively inconsistent; groups with faultlines can suffer (e.g., Earley and Mosakowski 2000, Dyck and Starke 1999, Li and Hambrick 2005 as well as benefit from faultlines (Gibson and Vermeulen 2003, Hart and Van Vugt 2006, Lau and Murnighan 2005. In this study, we examined how different faultline bases (social category and information-based faultlines) may have different effects on group outcomes Consistent with Lau and Murnighan's (1998) model of faultlines and intragroup processes, we found that the strength of social category faultlines was negatively associated with group performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Thus, an additional source of faultlines may be status within an organization. Certain groups may also have such strong faultlines with a large distance between subgroups that isolated, distinct groups may emerge, effectively cutting off contact between subgroups and triggering "exit dynamics" (Dyck andStarke 1999, Hart andVan Vugt 2006). Research on breakaway organizations and exit groups has led to a number of important insights, yet little is known about how the exit dynamics would unfold in common-goal organizational groups.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A critical mass of dissatisfied parents, about 50% of the total in both cases, left the schools according to the paradigm suggested by Dyck and Starke (1999). The dissatisfied stakeholders, led in the case of St.Ignatius/St.…”
Section: How Did the New Breakaway Schools Organize?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyck and Starke (1999) posited a theory of group exit based upon their study of various small Protestant congregations that split apart. The authors suggested that such breaks happened in stages, beginning with a period of relative harmony where potential conflicts exist beneath the surface, until, at some point, a conflicting idea or event occurs and ideas for change begin to develop.…”
Section: How and Why Do They Break Apart?mentioning
confidence: 99%