1994
DOI: 10.1063/1.868146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation of spilling breaking water waves

Abstract: Photographs from high-speed movies of the profiles of a mechanically generated, gentle spilling breaking water wave are presented. It is found that as the wave steepens a bulge forms on the forward face of the wave near the crest and capillary waves form on the water surface ahead of the ‘toe’ of the bulge (see Fig. 1). The toe of the bulge then moves rapidly down the forward face of the wave and a train of large-amplitude waves with short wavelength grows rapidly on the surface of the bulge. These waves quick… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shape is similar to that found in gentle short-wavelength spilling breakers (see [10]). The point of maximum upward curvature at the leading edge of the bulge is called the toe.…”
Section: Flow Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This shape is similar to that found in gentle short-wavelength spilling breakers (see [10]). The point of maximum upward curvature at the leading edge of the bulge is called the toe.…”
Section: Flow Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…To examine temporal and spatial variations of water-surface profiles, we used the laser-induced fluorescent (LIF) method. The LIF method has been used to record water-surface variations as early as 1980s (Yeh & Ghazali 1986;Ramsden 1993;Duncan et al 1994), and has significantly improved accuracy due to recent advances in optical devices (e.g. Duncan et al 1999;Gardarsson & Yeh 2007;Diorio, Liu & Duncan 2009).…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher wind speeds, radar cross sections are consistent at all fetches but the sonar return at the short fetch is much lower than at long fetch. We interpret this to indicate that parasitic capillaries dominate the scattering from bound waves at short fetches where the dominant wave is short enough to generate them but that other roughness, probably generated by gently spilling or "crumpling" gravity waves (Duncan et al, 1994;Longuet-Higgins, 1992), dominates the bound wave contribution at longer fetches. For this conclusion to be valid, bubble scattering must not significantly affect the sonar backscatter measurements, and bubble scattering was evaluated as follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%