2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.newar.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation of stellar black holes

Abstract: Abstract:It is believed that stellar black holes (BHs) can be formed in two different ways: Either a massive star collapses directly into a BH without a supernova (SN) explosion, or an explosion occurs in a proto-neutron star, but the energy is too low to completely unbind the stellar envelope, and a large fraction of it falls back onto the short-lived neutron star (NS), leading to the delayed formation of a BH. Theoretical models set progenitor masses for BH formation by implosion, namely, by complete or almo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current theoretical understanding does not show a direct correlation and suggests that there is no clean mass cut off for direct collapse formation (Sukhbold et al 2016). We have obtained observational constraints on the potential kicks of 16 BHXBs (Figure 10), which increases the sample size and updates the estimations of BHXB kicks by Mirabel (2017) and Gandhi et al (2019) (current peculiar velocity used as proxy in both works). We conducted correlation tests, which indicated negligible correlation between BH mass and kick, with a Pearson Rank coefficient of −0.23 ± 0.17 (p=0.21) and a Spearman Rank coefficient of −0.2 ± 0.17 (p=0.40).…”
Section: Natal Kicks and Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current theoretical understanding does not show a direct correlation and suggests that there is no clean mass cut off for direct collapse formation (Sukhbold et al 2016). We have obtained observational constraints on the potential kicks of 16 BHXBs (Figure 10), which increases the sample size and updates the estimations of BHXB kicks by Mirabel (2017) and Gandhi et al (2019) (current peculiar velocity used as proxy in both works). We conducted correlation tests, which indicated negligible correlation between BH mass and kick, with a Pearson Rank coefficient of −0.23 ± 0.17 (p=0.21) and a Spearman Rank coefficient of −0.2 ± 0.17 (p=0.40).…”
Section: Natal Kicks and Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Attempts have been made to understand if there is any relation between BH mass and the natal kick it receives (Mirabel 2017). This could assist in understanding the correlation between the final pathway a progenitor takes to become a BH and the mass of the BH.…”
Section: Natal Kicks and Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few (indirect) observational tests for binary misalignment. For instance, the proper motion of Cygnus X-1 is consistent with that of its natal association of O stars, implying that it felt no supernova kick [145]. Before we get excited that this explains why Cygnus X-1 has no QPOs however, we must also note that GRS 1915+105, which has very strong QPOs, also has no peculiar velocity with respect to its association [145].…”
Section: Are These Systems Misaligned?mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, the proper motion of Cygnus X-1 is consistent with that of its natal association of O stars, implying that it felt no supernova kick [145]. Before we get excited that this explains why Cygnus X-1 has no QPOs however, we must also note that GRS 1915+105, which has very strong QPOs, also has no peculiar velocity with respect to its association [145]. Another test comes from super-luminal jet ejections, because the 3D jet trajectory can be reconstructed by tracking the proper motion and brightness of approaching and receding lobes.…”
Section: Are These Systems Misaligned?mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Kalogera 1999;Podsiadlowski, Rappaport & Han 2003;Kiel & Hurley 2006). Meanwhile, the observed scale height is driven by the presence of natal kicks, a current hot topic in the field (Jonker & Nelemans 2004;Fragos et al 2009;Repetto et al 2017;Mirabel 2017;Casares, Jonker & Israelian 2017). It should be stressed here that, even if the total number of discovered BHs turns out to be lower than predicted, HAWKs will still set stringent constraints on BH formation models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%