1952
DOI: 10.1139/v52-057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Formation of Trifluoromethyl Radicals in the Gas Phase

Abstract: Trifluoromethyl radicals were produced by the reaction between atomic sodium and iodo-, broino-, and chloro-trifluoromethane in the diffusion flame apparatus. The results indicate that:(1) The primary reaction is CFXX + Na -+ NnX + CF3.(2) For the reaction between sodium and iodo-, bromo-, and chloro-trifli~oro-methane, the activation energy is 1.7, 2.3, and 7.4 kcal. per mole, respectively.(3) Some decomposition of trifluoromethyl radicals occurs, yielding chiefly tetrafluoroethylene.(4). Reaction occurs betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed experimental data for reactions (33), ( 37), (38) can sensibly be described by third-order kinetics within experimental error. 168-170 Calculations to allow for any marginal 'fall-off' to second-order kinetics for the relatively low pressure range with He ( < 0.15 atm) in atomic recombination measurements have been reported by Plane and co-workers 168-170 to include the observations of Luther et ~1 .…”
Section: ( C ) X + I + M -+ X I + Mmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The observed experimental data for reactions (33), ( 37), (38) can sensibly be described by third-order kinetics within experimental error. 168-170 Calculations to allow for any marginal 'fall-off' to second-order kinetics for the relatively low pressure range with He ( < 0.15 atm) in atomic recombination measurements have been reported by Plane and co-workers 168-170 to include the observations of Luther et ~1 .…”
Section: ( C ) X + I + M -+ X I + Mmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…as one proceeds down group VII. This trend is also seen in positive ion reactions (Morris et al 1992b-d) and in neutral-neutral reactions (Bradley et al 1976, Hodgins and Haines 1952, Le Bras and Combourieu 1978, Silver and De Haas 1981, Westenberg and De Haas 1977 where it can be explained simply by the decreasing C-X bond strength in the order CF3-C1> CF,-Br > CF,-I. For many of the negative ion reactions, however, there is evidence that the energetics and kinetics of electron transfer govern the reactivity by controlling the rate of electron transfer to the halocarbon in the initial phase of the reaction.…”
Section: Brf-cfbrmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…While complete systematic studies of the bromofluoromethanes with atoms other than boron have not been performed (for a review of such studies, see ref 10-13), the available published data show that the reactive behavior of boron with the halomethanes is not unique. [14][15][16][17] This can be Seen in Table VII, which compares reaction cross sections of boron, sodium, and gallium with CIF3, CBrF3, CC1F3, and CF4. As can be seen in all these cases, the reactivity of CC1F3 is 2 Orders of magnitude smaller than the reactivity of CBrF3 (and CIF3 in the case of gallium and sodium).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%