2006
DOI: 10.1155/ade/2006/31430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formulation of second-order boundary value problems on time scales

Abstract: We reconsider the basic formulation of second-order, two-point, Sturm-Liouville-type boundary value problems on time scales. Although this topic has received extensive attention in recent years, we present some simple examples which show that there are certain difficulties with the formulation of the problem as usually used in the literature. These difficulties can be avoided by some additional conditions on the structure of the time scale, but we show that these conditions are unnecessary, since in fact, a si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of boundary value problems for dynamic equations on time scales has recently received a lot of attention, see [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . At the same time, there have been significant developments in impulsive differential equations, see the monographs of Lakshmikantham et al 17 and Samoȋlenko and Perestyuk 18 .…”
Section: Advances In Difference Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of boundary value problems for dynamic equations on time scales has recently received a lot of attention, see [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . At the same time, there have been significant developments in impulsive differential equations, see the monographs of Lakshmikantham et al 17 and Samoȋlenko and Perestyuk 18 .…”
Section: Advances In Difference Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) In the previous literature, when defining the operator L it has been assumed that p ∈ C 1 rd (T κ ), q ∈ C 0 rd (T κ 2 ), and the domain of L is the subset of C 2 rd (T) satisfying the boundary conditions (5.2), while the codomain of L is C 0 rd (T κ 2 ), see for example [2,[4][5][6]8,11]. We observe that precise conditions on p and q are not always explicitly stated, but these conditions, or stronger ones, always seem to be implicitly assumed.…”
Section: Remarks 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note also that the formulation of the boundary conditions in (5.2) is somewhat different to the usual formulation. The justification for this is discussed in detail in [6]. In particular, if γ a = 0 then α a = 0, δ a = 0, and the boundary condition at a becomes u(σ (a)) = 0.…”
Section: Remarks 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the details of basic notions connected to time scales, we refer the readers to the books [2,3] and the papers [4,5], which are useful references for calculus on time scales. Hereafter, we use the notation [ , ] T to indicate the time scale interval [ , ]∩T.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details of boundary value problems involving integral boundary conditions, see, for instance, [6,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and references therein. Also this type of problems includes twopoint, three-point, and multipoint boundary value problems as special cases [4,5,7,20] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%