The Fortress Beneath: Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging of the Citadel at Alcatraz: 1. A Guide for Interpretation

Abstract

Ground-penetrating radar has emerged as a prominent non-destructive evaluation tool for the study of inaccessible subsurface elements of cultural heritage structures. Often of central interest is the desire to image the remains of a pre-existing historic structure that is located directly beneath a more recently built one. The interpretation of GPR images in such cases is usually difficult due to ambiguities caused by the presence of pervasive clutter, environmental noise, and overlapping target signatures. Sites with abundant ground truth allow for more confident interpretations and serve as a useful testbed to assist similar studies at other places, where little or no ground truth is available. This study reports GPR interpretations of structures belonging to the 19th century Citadel beneath the main prison cellhouse at Alcatraz. At this site, lidar scans, direct observations, and historical documents are available to facilitate identification of radar target signatures. A general interpretation of the acquired radargrams is made in this paper, while the companion paper presents more advanced analysis of target signatures based on curvelet image processing. This study points to the development of a radar facies classification scheme that is specific to cultural heritage investigations.

Unveiling the Hidden Secrets of Bomarzo Cathedral: New Evidence from Last Ground-Penetrating Radar Survey

“…Its non-invasive nature preserves historical structures, while its high-resolution imaging capabilities help detect hidden features, structural anomalies, and several crucial pieces of information relevant to the geophysical investigation. Moreover, GPR's depth profiling, real-time data collection, and data integration with archaeological and historical records enhance the QA/QC process [17][18][19][20][21].…”

Rapid Assessment of Landslide Dynamics by UAV-RTK Repeated Surveys Using Ground Targets: The Ca’ Lita Landslide (Northern Apennines, Italy)

“…The potential sources of errors, random and systematic, estimated by considering the scattering of the reference target (P_01, Figure 7A) positions in time and by comparing P_05 values with those of the GNSS ROV2 (Figure 11A,B), resulted in a maximum planimetric positioning error of 2.5 cm and a maximum vertical positioning error of 3.2 cm. Unlike what happens in other applications, such as those related to cultural heritage management where even millimeter precision is needed [67], in this context (considering the landslide activity), centimetric planimetric and vertical errors can be considered as acceptable. The major scattering (22.3 cm vertical and 18.6 cm planimetric displacement) is encountered during the period 3 January 2023-21 March 2023, in correspondence with the main acceleration.…”

Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Deformation Monitoring of the Ming Great Wall in Shanxi Province through InSAR

“…However, these methods are not only labor-intensive and time-consuming but are also prone to oversight issues [9]. In recent years, surveying techniques, such as leveling, global satellite navigation systems, laser scanning, and groundpenetrating radar, have been increasingly employed to monitor the sustainability and stability of cultural heritage [10][11][12][13][14].…”