2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The four-dimensional stress test: Psychological, sympathetic–adrenal–medullary, parasympathetic and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal responses following inhalation of 35% CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity, pre-stress values were compared with maximal (peak) values during the task and post-task values for each individual for heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (Kaye et al, 2004;Hruschka, Kohrt, & Worthman, 2005;Wetherell et al, 2006) and were assessed across the three workload intensities using two way (low, medium, high intensity X pre, peak, post value) repeated measures analysis of variance. Pre-post differences in mood parameters were assessed across the three workload intensities using two-way (low, medium and high intensity X pre-post stress) repeated measures analysis of variance.…”
Section: Treatment Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To account for individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity, pre-stress values were compared with maximal (peak) values during the task and post-task values for each individual for heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (Kaye et al, 2004;Hruschka, Kohrt, & Worthman, 2005;Wetherell et al, 2006) and were assessed across the three workload intensities using two way (low, medium, high intensity X pre, peak, post value) repeated measures analysis of variance. Pre-post differences in mood parameters were assessed across the three workload intensities using two-way (low, medium and high intensity X pre-post stress) repeated measures analysis of variance.…”
Section: Treatment Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques exist for eliciting acute psychological stress in controlled settings; however, they vary in terms of their level of ecological validity, that is, the degree to which they represent the types of stressors encountered in real world settings. Effective laboratory stressors should provide a snapshot of how an individual would respond to a stressor encountered in real life (Wetherell et al, 2006). In support, Kudielka and WÜst (2010) recently highlighted the lack of studies investigating the ecological validity of psychological stress protocols and urged the development of alternative stress protocols, particularly, protocols suitable for repeated administration in the same participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that CO 2 inhalation in very high concentration will activate key homeostatic mechanisms involved in the human stress response. Inhalation of 35% CO 2 leads to an increase in serum noradrenalin and cortisol (63). This may affect metabolism and pH homeostasis and, in turn, the expression of the transporters or may even have a direct effect on transporter expression (1,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amylase is an enzyme used to hydrolyze or break down starch molecules in the body. The levels of amylase in the body have been used as an effective measure of stress, including social stress such as performance in front of an audience (Nater, La Marca, Florin, Moses, Langhans, Koller, & Ehlert, 2006;Rohleder, Wolf, Maldonado, & Kirschbaum, 2006;Gordis, Granger, Susman, & Trickett, 2006;Nater, Rohleder, Gaab, Berger, Jud, Kirschbaum, & Ehlert, 2005;Rohleder, Natar, Wolf, Ehlert, & Kirschbaum, 2004), testing (Yamaguchi, Kanemori, Kanemaru, Takai, Mizuno, & Yoshida, 2004), competition (Kivlighan & Granger, 2006), and physical stress (Wetherell, Crown, Lightman, Miles, Kaye, & Vedhara, 2006;Chatterton, Vogelsong, Lu, Ellman, & Hudgens, 1996). Although objective, accurate, and repeatable, this method is time consuming, intrusive (experimentally as well as human intrusive), and costly and requires specialized laboratory equipment to analyze the saliva samples.…”
Section: Salivary Amylasementioning
confidence: 99%