2017
DOI: 10.1111/maps.12906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fourth Arab Impact Cratering and Astrogeology Conference (AICAC IV), April 9–12, 2017, Algiers (Algeria)

Abstract: We present a report about the fourth Arab Impact Cratering and Astrogeology Conference (AICAC IV) that took place in Algiers at the USTHB (Universit e des Sciences et Technologie Houari Boumedienne, Algiers, Algeria) in the presence of the presidents of the USTHB and Boumerd es Universities, the Director of CRAAG (Centre de Recherche en Astronomie, Astrophysique et G eophysique), and the General Director of the National Administration for Scientific Research (NASR/DGRSDT). This series of conferences aims to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth emphasizing however that despite data rejecting any evidence of melt products and ejecta, other authors have interpreted their petrographic observations as evidence of carbonate melting as a consequence of shock metamorphism (e.g., Sahoui et al, 2016). Others proposed that the remnant‐melted material can have a significant presence within the fracture network or buried beneath the recent sediment of the crater depression, either as a primary phase or as an erosion product (Belhai et al, 2017). Although the work by Lamali et al (2020) did not indicate any anomalous near‐surface electromagnetic signatures of such typical material, the debate about its hidden character is still ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth emphasizing however that despite data rejecting any evidence of melt products and ejecta, other authors have interpreted their petrographic observations as evidence of carbonate melting as a consequence of shock metamorphism (e.g., Sahoui et al, 2016). Others proposed that the remnant‐melted material can have a significant presence within the fracture network or buried beneath the recent sediment of the crater depression, either as a primary phase or as an erosion product (Belhai et al, 2017). Although the work by Lamali et al (2020) did not indicate any anomalous near‐surface electromagnetic signatures of such typical material, the debate about its hidden character is still ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%