2014
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Foveal Position Relative to the Optic Disc and the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Profile in Myopia

Abstract: The intrinsic foveal position relative to the optic disc was an essential determinant of normal RNFL thickness in myopia. In particular, it was associated with the vertical asymmetry of RNFL distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
64
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…14,32 We set the reference line as the fovea-ONH center axis to minimize the influence of the variability, although the effect was not fully determined. [33][34][35][36] The 24-2 VF grid has four test points between (and including) fixation and the optic disc (i.e., test point numbers 34, 35, 44, and 45 in Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,32 We set the reference line as the fovea-ONH center axis to minimize the influence of the variability, although the effect was not fully determined. [33][34][35][36] The 24-2 VF grid has four test points between (and including) fixation and the optic disc (i.e., test point numbers 34, 35, 44, and 45 in Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of temporal and vertical tilt was measured from HRT printouts using the ImageJ software, as described previously. 19,23 Temporal disc tilt was defined as the tilt degree between a horizontal line and a line drawn manually to connect the two points where the height profile and disc margin met. Vertical disc tilt was defined as the angle between the vertical line and the line connecting the two points where the height profile and disc margin met.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlikely to be caused by a bias in the measured foveal depression angles because they varied from À28 to À158 across individuals in our study, very similar to results of other studies. 9,13,37,38 Other possible sources attributed to the raphe angle variance include subjects' head position and measurement errors of identifying the disc center, fovea, and raphe. Future studies are warranted to investigate the roles of these sources of variance on the raphe angle measurement.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%