2017
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire for self‐assessment of basic symptoms in the early detection of psychosis—Factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity

Abstract: We could confirm a 2- to 4-factor structure of the FCQ in a sample of at-risk mental state and first-episode psychosis patients using confirmatory factor analysis. Contrary to interview-assessed cognitive-perceptive BS, self-assessed BS do not seem to improve prediction of psychosis. This result reinforces reports of poor correspondence between interview- and questionnaire-assessed BS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two papers also highlighted that the longitudinal effects of consumer measures can be examined using a block stratified multiple regression model (Ruggeri et al , 2001) and survival analysis which examines later transition to psychosis of consumers (Uttinger et al , 2018). For instance, Uttinger et al (2018) applied the Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire to predict later transition to psychosis among consumers using univariate Cox proportional hazard models. The FCQ totals or factors were used as the independent variable and the time to transition to psychosis was used as the outcome measure (Uttinger et al , 2018).…”
Section: Analysing Structural Models Of Consumer Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two papers also highlighted that the longitudinal effects of consumer measures can be examined using a block stratified multiple regression model (Ruggeri et al , 2001) and survival analysis which examines later transition to psychosis of consumers (Uttinger et al , 2018). For instance, Uttinger et al (2018) applied the Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire to predict later transition to psychosis among consumers using univariate Cox proportional hazard models. The FCQ totals or factors were used as the independent variable and the time to transition to psychosis was used as the outcome measure (Uttinger et al , 2018).…”
Section: Analysing Structural Models Of Consumer Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Uttinger et al (2018) applied the Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire to predict later transition to psychosis among consumers using univariate Cox proportional hazard models. The FCQ totals or factors were used as the independent variable and the time to transition to psychosis was used as the outcome measure (Uttinger et al , 2018).…”
Section: Analysing Structural Models Of Consumer Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the BSABS, SPI-A, and SPI-CY that are assessed in clinical interviews by trained clinicians, the FCQ is a self-report questionnaire developed from example statements of the BSABS. Compared to the interview instruments, the FCQ has the advantage of not necessitating training to be administered, and it is the most extensive self-report BSs questionnaire used [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, while from instruments dealing with clinical assessments of BSs (such as those performed through the BSABS), two partially overlapping psychosis-risk criteria were developed -the cognitive-perceptive BS [50], and the cognitive disturbances [31], basic symptoms identified by self-reported questionnaires, such as the FCQ, ap-DOI: 10.1159/000514926 pear to be less linked to a specific diagnosis. For this reason, as well as the missing correspondence of its items with presumably corresponding BS assessed in a clinical interview [51], FCQ has not been recommended as a psychosis-risk screener of BSs criteria [41,51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other relationships can now be examined in more detail using the latest genetic, neuroimaging and behavioral methods. Among the most relevant areas of research on sensorimotor abnormalities are: (1) sensorimotor development in children and adolescents ( Filatova et al, 2017( Filatova et al, , 2018, (2) sensorimotor abnormalities as vulnerability markers in individuals with psychosis risk syndrome Kent et al, 2019 ;Kindler et al, 2019 ;Mittal et al, 2014 ), (3) sensorimotor signs and symptoms as predictors of the clinical course in patients with first-episode SZ ( Cuesta et al, 2018a( Cuesta et al, , 2014, (4) neuronal correlates of sensorimotor and psychomotor dysfunction in SZ spectrum disorders Martino et al, 2020Martino et al, , 2018Northoff et al, 2004 ;Walther et al, 2017a , b ), (5) impaired hand gesture performance in SZ ( Dutschke et al, 2018 ;Viher et al, 2018 ;Walther et al, 2019aWalther and Mittal, 2016 ;Walther et al, 2015b ), (6) assessment of movement abnormalities with objective instruments ( Mentzel et al, 2016b ;van Harten et al, 2017 ;Willems et al, 2016 ), (7) motor systems as a novel target for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) ( Mittal and Walther, 2019 ) and, as a cross-cutting objective, (8) contrasting their different empirically defined models, e.g. dimensional vs categorical, on various biological measurements, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%