The Free Movement of Workers in an Enlarged European Union: Institutional Underpinnings of Economic Adjustment

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S ABSTRACT The Free Movement of Workers in an Enlarged European Union: Institutional Underpinnings of Economic AdjustmentThe eastern enlargements of the European Union (EU) and the extension of the free movement of workers to the new member states' citizens unleashed significant east-west migration flows in a labor market with more than half a billion people. Although many old member states applied transitional arrangements temporarily restricting the free movement of new member states' citizens, the need for adjustment became ever more important during the Great Recession, which affected EU member states unevenly. This chapter studies whether and how east-west migration flows in an enlarged EU responded to institutional and economic factors. We first develop a simple framework of adjustment through migration of workers between labor markets affected by asymmetric economic shocks. Using a new migration dataset and treating the EU enlargement and labor market openings towards the new EU members as a natural experiment allows us to estimate the effects of the EU accession and economic opportunities on migration. Applying the difference-in-differences and triple differences empirical modeling framework, we subsequently find that east-west migration flows in the EU responded positively to the EU entry and economic opportunities in receiving labor markets. However, this potential through which migration helped to ease the imbalances across EU labor markets was hampered by transitional arrangements, which negatively affected the flows of east-west migrants. We conclude that the free movement of workers is an asset that the EU needs to nurture as a means of adjusting to structural economic asymmetries as well as to short-run shocks across EU member states.JEL Classification: F22, J61, J68

Theorising new European youth mobilities

“…Several econometric studies reviewed by Kahanec, Pytlikova, and Zimmermann () suggest that, indeed, the enlarged EU's experience with the free movement of labour tells a “virtuous story” in terms of driving aggregate gross domestic product upward and creating beneficial employment effects, offering opportunities for both low‐ and high‐skilled labour and facilitating a dynamic interchange of population. Moreover, according to Kahanec et al (: 2‐4), there is little evidence of immigration increasing unemployment rates amongst “native” workers or to support the “welfare magnet” or “benefit tourism” hypotheses. Apart from housing prices and rents in migration hot spots, inflationary pressures are held down by a circulating supply of labour, and labour mobility and flexibility help to absorb the effects of asymmetric economic shocks such as the 2008 economic crisis.…”

Opportunity or threat? Public attitudes towards EU freedom of movement

“…By contrast, emigration from more affluent EU member states was much lower during the same period. The key drivers of intra-EU migration were economic, related to labour market factors, with EU migrants moving abroad to seek better job opportunities rather than being attracted by the host countryÕs welfare generosity (Giuletti 2014;Kahanec et al, 2014;Portes 2015).…”

Migration decisions in the face of upheaval: An experimental approach

“…Intra‐European migration is a deeply embedded phenomenon that has resulted in 15.3 million persons living in one of the European Union (EU) member states on January 1, 2015, who have the citizenship of another EU member state (Eurostat, ). The increase in intra‐European migration has been facilitated by a combination of factors: the removal of travel restrictions, successive enlargements of the Union, and relatively sustained, if cyclical, economic growth for much of the post‐1950 period (Kahanec, Pytliková, & Zimmermann, ). However, major upheavals in the last decade have underscored the precariousness of such conditions.…”