1976
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197603000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Free Musculocutaneous Flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature there are only a few reports about free muscle flaps for reconstruction in the head and neck region. The gracilis flap as a free flap was first described by Harii et al 8 in 1976. Since then, the flap has proven its reliability in reconstructive surgery in a multitude of clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature there are only a few reports about free muscle flaps for reconstruction in the head and neck region. The gracilis flap as a free flap was first described by Harii et al 8 in 1976. Since then, the flap has proven its reliability in reconstructive surgery in a multitude of clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] In the same year Harii et al reported the first gracilis free flap for reconstruction of the head and neck and lower extremity. [4] Since the late seventies the gracilis myocutaneous flap has been used for soft tissue reconstruction of the breasts [5] , head and neck [6] , upper and lower extremity [7] and the genitoperineal region. [8] It has also been used as a free functioning muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion [9] , dynamic analplasty [10] and facial reanimation.…”
Section: Name and Address Of Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free gracilis muscle flap was used for all patients [5,6], as it has an easy constant anatomy, reliable vascular pedicles (second minor pedicle arising from the superficial femoral artery), and minimal donor-site morbidity (concealed donor scar and no functional loss) [7,8]. In addition, all maneuvers were done by epidural regional analgesia with no need for general anesthesia.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%