2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The free osteofasciocutaneous fibula flap: Clinical applications and surgical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study reported high HRQoL after reconstruction of a radius with a free osteocutaneous fibula graft. 39 In the present series, the authors compared postoperative generic HRQoL to that of the general Finnish population. The study confirmed that the free vascularized fibula graft in upper extremity reconstruction yields good HRQoL outcomes, even in patients with significantly impaired upper extremity function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study reported high HRQoL after reconstruction of a radius with a free osteocutaneous fibula graft. 39 In the present series, the authors compared postoperative generic HRQoL to that of the general Finnish population. The study confirmed that the free vascularized fibula graft in upper extremity reconstruction yields good HRQoL outcomes, even in patients with significantly impaired upper extremity function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Thus, some authors recommend performing routine preoperative ultrasonic Doppler flowmeter and an angiography if there is any uncertainty. 20 However, the posterior approach obviates the need for such measures, given its provision of an excellent visualization of the vasculature. Once it has been visualized that the posterior tibialis artery is present, harvest of the fibula flap may proceed without any concern for devascularizing the leg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24] While the sensational advantages of the RFFF cannot be disputed, the bony component of the fibula flap adds durable rigidity for sexual intercourse that can eliminate the need for a prosthesis. 1,19 Typically, this flap has three stages: harvest (►Fig. 2) and prelamination of the neourethra with split-thickness skin graft for 6 months before flap inset; inset of the free sensate osteocutaneous fibular flap (►Fig.…”
Section: Fibular Osteocutaneous Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Other complications included poor wound healing, infection, inflammation of the neoscrotum, neourethra stenosis, and prosthesis failure. [19][20][21][22][23] One study by Schaff and Papadopulos comparing the fibula flap to the RFFF found that patients who underwent the fibular flap interestingly experienced better sexual intercourse but had worse sensation. All patients reported the ability to void while standing, as well as satisfactory sexual intercourse, with minimal donor-site morbidity.…”
Section: Fibular Osteocutaneous Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%