This article examines North Macedonia as a prime example of a candidate state
whose efforts to join the European Union (EU) have been repeatedly hindered
by vetoes from several Member States, including Greece, France, and
Bulgaria. The author argues that North Macedonia?s case highlights both the
necessity and the challenges associated with reforming the EU?s enlargement
decision-making mechanism. From a comparative and historical perspective,
this paper examines the Greek and Bulgarian vetoes in North Macedonia?s
accession process within the context of prevailing narratives in the two
countries? policymaking. The author uses document and discourse analysis.
The article concludes with insights into the ?logic? of national vetoes, the
stakes involved in their use, and the prospects for reforming the EU?s
enlargement decision-making process.