2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.17.431499
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The frequency and topology of pseudoorthologs

Abstract: Phylogenetics has long relied on the use of orthologs, or genes related through speciation events, to infer species relationships. However, identifying orthologs is difficult because gene duplication can obscure relationships among genes. Researchers have been particularly concerned with the insidious effects of pseudoorthologs—duplicated genes that are mistaken for orthologs because they are present in a single copy in each sampled species. Because gene tree topologies of pseudoorthologs may differ from the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hidden paralogs, biological or artifactual, are not typically accounted for in phylogenomic datasets (Smith and Hahn, 2021a; 2021b), but they are a potential source of inaccurate signal and additional conflict in datasets for which gene tree discordance is already high. This is especially true in herbariomic datasets and systems for which little is known about the history of gene or genome duplication in the system, a common limitation in plant groups (Li and Barker 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hidden paralogs, biological or artifactual, are not typically accounted for in phylogenomic datasets (Smith and Hahn, 2021a; 2021b), but they are a potential source of inaccurate signal and additional conflict in datasets for which gene tree discordance is already high. This is especially true in herbariomic datasets and systems for which little is known about the history of gene or genome duplication in the system, a common limitation in plant groups (Li and Barker 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bipartition support was calculated against an ASTRAL-III tree (Zhang et al 2018) inferred from the best maximum likelihood (ML) topologies of 314 gene trees. With the assumption that coalescent methods are robust enough to noise to produce an approximate species tree from all supposed orthologous loci (Markin and Eulenstein 2020; Legried et al 2021; Smith and Hahn 2021b; Yan et al 2021), we expect that truly single-copy gene trees should be more similar to the species tree than trees for cryptic multi-copy genes. For the first level of filtering, gene trees with average and above bipartition support were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations