2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The frequency dependence of scattering imprints on pulsar observations

Abstract: Observations of pulsars across the radio spectrum are revealing a dependence of the characteristic scattering time (τ ) on frequency, which is more complex than the simple power law with a theoretically predicted power law index. In this paper we investigate these effects using simulated pulsar data at frequencies below 300 MHz. We investigate different scattering mechanisms, namely isotropic and anisotropic scattering, by thin screens along the line of sight, and the particular frequency dependent impact on p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A turnover in the flux spectrum (unrelated to a long scattering tail) is seen for PSR J1935+1616. However, as shown in Geyer & Karastergiou (2016), such a scenario would involve an observable change in the pulse profile shapes at low frequencies, which is not evident in the data. Soft edges of the screen, multiple screens and low S/N profiles can render these particular effects difficult to discern.…”
Section: Psr J0040+5716mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A turnover in the flux spectrum (unrelated to a long scattering tail) is seen for PSR J1935+1616. However, as shown in Geyer & Karastergiou (2016), such a scenario would involve an observable change in the pulse profile shapes at low frequencies, which is not evident in the data. Soft edges of the screen, multiple screens and low S/N profiles can render these particular effects difficult to discern.…”
Section: Psr J0040+5716mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As we mentioned in the Introduction, and also discussed previously in Kijak et al (2011b) and Dembska et al (2015a) that may lead to severe underestimation of the received flux density, when measured by a standard pulse profile based method 2 . The theoretical aspects of the influence of interstellar scattering on the observed pulsar flux were also recently discussed by Geyer & Karastergiou (2016). This calls for caution when using archival (or catalog) flux density measurements, especially at low frequencies, where the effects of scattering-induced flux underestimation will be strongest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also see α values below 2.61 but discarded them due to poor data quality. Geyer & Karastergiou (2016) simulated anisotropicaly scattered data and fit it with the isotropic model which results in α values less than the theoretically predicted values as well as the effect of non-circular scattering screens leading to low α values (∼ 2.9). Scattering spectra with α < 4 have been interpreted as a limitation of assumptions underlying the thin scattering model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%