2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The frequency of accretion disks around single stars: Chamaeleon I

Abstract: Context. It is well known that stellar companions can influence the evolution of a protoplanetary disk. Nevertheless, previous disk surveys did not -and could not -consistently exclude binaries from their samples. Aims. We present a study dedicated to investigating the frequency of ongoing disk accretion around single stars in a star-forming region. Methods. We obtained near-infrared spectroscopy of 54 low-mass stars selected from a high-angular resolution survey in the 2-3 Myrold Chamaeleon I region to determ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single star accretor fraction appears to be slightly larger but consistent with both wide binaries and the decay curve found by previous surveys without binary correction (e.g., Fedele et al 2010). In particular, our new measurement of the single star accretor fraction is less than 1σ larger than previous estimates of the accretion frequency in Chamaeleon I (∼41%, based on Damjanov et al 2007). The data disfavor a scenario where all stars retain their disks until 2-3 Myr (Alexander & Armitage 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The single star accretor fraction appears to be slightly larger but consistent with both wide binaries and the decay curve found by previous surveys without binary correction (e.g., Fedele et al 2010). In particular, our new measurement of the single star accretor fraction is less than 1σ larger than previous estimates of the accretion frequency in Chamaeleon I (∼41%, based on Damjanov et al 2007). The data disfavor a scenario where all stars retain their disks until 2-3 Myr (Alexander & Armitage 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Disk frequency of single stars and components of binary stars in the Orion Nebula Cluster (1 Myr) and Chamaeleon I (2 Myr). Left: accretion inferred from Brackett-γ emission.Right: hot circumstellar dust as inferred from H-K and K-L ′ excess(Daemgen et al 2012(Daemgen et al , 2013(Daemgen et al , 2015. The blue continuous and dotted lines show exponential decay functions measured byFedele et al (2010, τaccr ∼ 2.3 Myr, τ dust ∼ 3 Myr), not corrected for undetected multiplicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The high Class I-to-Class II ratio together with the absence of a significant Class III population suggests that the age of the cluster is much shorter than typical disk dispersal timescales. The latter are suspected to depend on the central object's mass, the stellar density of the environment (Luhman et al 2010) and binarity (Daemgen et al 2016), but disk lifetimes of 1-3 Myr appear to be typical, both on a theoretical and an observational basis (e.g., Li & Xiao 2016). The duration of the Class I phase has been traditionally estimated by comparing the relative number of Class I to Class II YSOs in star-forming regions under the assumption of a constant star-formation rate (Evans et al 2009), but recent work based on detailed observations and modelling of the accretion on the central object have challenged an evolutionary picture in which the circumstellar envelope steadily disperses until the Class I/II transition takes place, suggesting instead that Class I objects may reach ages comparable to those of T Tauri stars, up to 1 Myr and older (White et al 2007, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, studying coeval systems could yield new constraints for models of planet formation. For example, stars in multiple systems are less likely to be observed to have a disc at any age when compared with single stars (Cieza et al 2009;Daemgen et al 2013Daemgen et al , 2015, yet planets have been detected in a variety of multiple systems (e.g. Doyle et al 2011;Roell et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%