The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AimCoinfecting bacterial pathogens are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in influenza. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the magnitude of coinfection in influenza patients.MethodA systematic search of MeSH, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed was performed. Studies of humans in which all individuals had laboratory confirmed influenza, and all individuals were tested for an array of common bacterial species, met inclusion criteria.ResultsTwenty‐seven studies including 3215 participants met all inclusion criteria. Common etiologies were defined from a subset of eight articles. There was high heterogeneity in the results (I 2 = 95%), with reported coinfection rates ranging from 2% to 65%. Although only a subset of papers were responsible for observed heterogeneity, subanalyses and meta‐regression analysis found no study characteristic that was significantly associated with coinfection. The most common coinfecting species were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, which accounted for 35% (95% CI, 14%–56%) and 28% (95% CI, 16%–40%) of infections, respectively; a wide range of other pathogens caused the remaining infections. An assessment of bias suggested that lack of small‐study publications may have biased the results.ConclusionsThe frequency of coinfection in the published studies included in this review suggests that although providers should consider possible bacterial coinfection in all patients hospitalized with influenza, they should not assume all patients are coinfected and be sure to properly treat underlying viral processes. Further, high heterogeneity suggests additional large‐scale studies are needed to better understand the etiology of influenza bacterial coinfection.

Co-infection in severe influenza: a new epidemiology?

“…It is highly probable that the mechanism explaining the higher mortality is due to either to the bacterial infection itself or to an association of virulence factors from both virus and bacteria. Lastly, as shown in this paper and others, the epidemiology of pathogens responsible for co-infection is regional and likely depends on many local factors, but may also be subject to change over time, with emergence in the community of pathogens usually seen in nosocomial infections [6,7,9,12].…”

“…Interestingly, the authors found an apparent increased rate of co-infection over time (from 11.4% in 2009 to 23.4% in 2015), without clear explanation. A recent meta-analysis showed that co-infection rates ranged from 2 to 65% [7]. This difference between studies could be explained by differences in methods of sampling, timing of samples, prehospital antibiotic administration, and different definitions of co-infection (i.e., whether or not it was microbiologically confirmed, etc.).…”

Host‐pathogen kinetics during influenza infection and coinfection: insights from predictive modeling

“…Complications arising from bacterial superinfections have accounted for a significant percentage of influenza‐related morbidity and mortality during pandemic influenza (40%‐95%) and during seasonal influenza (2%‐35%) . Common pathogens responsible for this enhanced disease include the gram‐positive bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) and Staphylococcus aureus .…”

Prevalence of influenza A infection in the Middle‐East: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Respiratory tract infections are one of the most common acute illness which can be classified into two main types including upper and lower respiratory tract infection (URI, LRI), which caused by bacteria, viruses and mycobacteria . Influenza virus is a major cause of acute respiratory disease in human and many animal species; so that approximately 20% of the world's population annually are infected by influenza, resulting in a significant growth in morbidity and mortality . Influenza, a member of the Orthomyxoviridae family, is characterized by segmented negative‐sense RNA genomes.…”