Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurological condition, characterized by spinal cord injury secondary to degenerative changes in the spine. Misdiagnosis in primary care forms part of a complex picture leading to an average diagnostic delay of 2 years. This leads to potentially preventable and permanent disability. A lack of awareness secondary to deficits in postgraduate education may contribute to these delays. Objective This study aims to assess the awareness of DCM in the setting of general practice. Methods General practitioners completed a quantitative web-based cross-sectional questionnaire. The 17-item questionnaire captured data regarding demographics, subjective awareness, and objective knowledge. The questionnaire was disseminated via professional networks, including via practice managers and senior practice partners. Incentivization was provided via a bespoke DCM fact sheet for those that completed the survey. Results A total of 54 general practitioners representing all 4 UK nations responded to the survey. General practitioners most commonly self-assessed that they had “limited awareness” of DCM (n=24, 51%). General practitioners felt most commonly “moderately able” to recognize a case of DCM (n=21, 46%). In total, 13% (n=6) of respondents reported that they would not be at all able to recognize a patient with DCM. Respondents most commonly reported that they were “moderately confident” in their ability to triage a patient with DCM (n=19, 41%). A quarter of respondents reported no prior introduction to DCM throughout their medical training (n=13, 25%). The mean score for knowledge-based questions was 42.6% (SD 3.96%) with the lowest performance observed in patient demographic and clinical recognition items. Conclusions General practitioners lack confidence in the recognition and management of DCM. These findings are consistent with the diagnostic delays previously described in the literature at the primary care level. Further work to develop and implement educational interventions to general practitioner practices is a crucial step to improving patient outcomes in DCM.
Background Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurological condition, characterized by spinal cord injury secondary to degenerative changes in the spine. Misdiagnosis in primary care forms part of a complex picture leading to an average diagnostic delay of 2 years. This leads to potentially preventable and permanent disability. A lack of awareness secondary to deficits in postgraduate education may contribute to these delays. Objective This study aims to assess the awareness of DCM in the setting of general practice. Methods General practitioners completed a quantitative web-based cross-sectional questionnaire. The 17-item questionnaire captured data regarding demographics, subjective awareness, and objective knowledge. The questionnaire was disseminated via professional networks, including via practice managers and senior practice partners. Incentivization was provided via a bespoke DCM fact sheet for those that completed the survey. Results A total of 54 general practitioners representing all 4 UK nations responded to the survey. General practitioners most commonly self-assessed that they had “limited awareness” of DCM (n=24, 51%). General practitioners felt most commonly “moderately able” to recognize a case of DCM (n=21, 46%). In total, 13% (n=6) of respondents reported that they would not be at all able to recognize a patient with DCM. Respondents most commonly reported that they were “moderately confident” in their ability to triage a patient with DCM (n=19, 41%). A quarter of respondents reported no prior introduction to DCM throughout their medical training (n=13, 25%). The mean score for knowledge-based questions was 42.6% (SD 3.96%) with the lowest performance observed in patient demographic and clinical recognition items. Conclusions General practitioners lack confidence in the recognition and management of DCM. These findings are consistent with the diagnostic delays previously described in the literature at the primary care level. Further work to develop and implement educational interventions to general practitioner practices is a crucial step to improving patient outcomes in DCM.
BACKGROUND Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurological condition, characterised by spinal cord injury secondary to degenerative changes in the spine. Misdiagnosis in primary care forms part of a complex picture leading to an average diagnostic delay of 2 years. This leads to potentially preventable and permanent disability. A lack of awareness secondary to deficits in postgraduate educational may contribute to these delays. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the awareness of DCM in the setting of general practice. METHODS General practitioners (GPs) completed a quantitative web-based cross-sectional questionnaire. The 17-item questionnaire captured data regarding demographics, subjective awareness, and objective knowledge. The questionnaire was disseminated via professional networks, including via practice managers and senior practice partners. Incentivisation was provided via a bespoke DCM fact sheet for those that completed the survey. RESULTS A total of 54 GPs representing all 4 UK nations responded to the survey. GPs most commonly self-assessed that they had ‘Limited Awareness’ of DCM (n=24, 51.1%). GPs felt most commonly ‘Moderately Able’ to recognise a case of DCM (n=21, 45.65%). In total 13.0% (n=6) of respondents reported that they would not be at all able to recognise a patient with DCM. Respondents most commonly reported that they were ‘Moderately Confident’ in their ability to triage a patient with DCM (n=19, 41.30%). A quarter of respondents reported no prior introduction to DCM throughout their medical training (n=13, 24.53%). The mean score for knowledge-based questions was 42.6 ± 3.96 % with the lowest performance observed in patient demographic and clinical recognition items. CONCLUSIONS GPs lack confidence in the recognition and management of DCM. These findings are consistent with the diagnostic delays previously described in the literature at the primary care level. Further work to develop and implement educational interventions to GP practices is a crucial step to improving patient outcomes in DCM.
Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy is a progressive neurological disorder that is commonly encountered in clinical practice and its incidence is expected to increase alongside the aging population. Given the importance of early and accurate diagnosis in this patient population, this narrative review aims to provide a repository of up-to-date information regarding pertinent patient history, physical exam findings, and potential alternate diagnoses. Methods: The PubMed database was queried for publications from 1 January 2019 to 19 March 2024. The search terms utilized are as follows: cervical myelopathy”, “cervical spondylotic myelopathy”, “degenerative cervical myelopathy”, “epidemiology”, “prevalence”, “incidence”, “etiology”, “diagnosis”, “differential”, “symptoms’‘, “clinical presentation”, and “atypical symptoms”. The resultant articles were reviewed for relevance and redundancy and are presented within the following categories: Natural History, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management. Results: Myelopathy patients often present with subtle and non-specific symptoms such as sleep disturbances, increased falls, and difficulty driving, which can lead to underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis. Failing to diagnose degenerative cervical myelopathy in a timely manner can result in progressive and irreparable neurological damage. Although many nonoperative treatment modalities are available, surgical decompression is ultimately recommended in most cases to limit further deterioration in neurological function and optimize long-term patient outcomes. Conclusions: A thorough clinical history and physical examination remain the most important diagnostic tools to avoid misdiagnosis and implement early treatment in this patient population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.