2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The freshwater artisanal fishery of Patos Lagoon

Abstract: In this study data relative to the fishery in the freshwater area of the Patos Lagoon are analysed, and the dynamics, fishing gears used and catches evaluated. The results reveal the existence of two fishery strategies: forbidden mesh size gillnets (FMG; <35 mm; square measure) and allowed mesh size gillnets (AMG; ≥35 mm; square measure). In total, 31 species were caught (AMG = 27 and FMG = 24), but selectivity due to mesh size was significant (P < 0·001). The FMG may be very harmful since it captures individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the species does not move toward the rivers forming the Patos Basin, as no specimens were caught in the extensive Sinos River sampling program, in agreement with its absence from museum collections. Unfortunately, the smallest mesh size used by Ceni et al (2016) was 35 mm (adjacent knots), and direct comparison of the species size profile with the present samples (taken using mesh sizes from 15 mm) is not possible. Nevertheless, it is clear that M. furnieri could be present in the northern Patos Lagoon and Guaíba Lake during all months of the year, from juveniles to adults, although mostly juveniles occur in southern Guaíba Lake in winter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the species does not move toward the rivers forming the Patos Basin, as no specimens were caught in the extensive Sinos River sampling program, in agreement with its absence from museum collections. Unfortunately, the smallest mesh size used by Ceni et al (2016) was 35 mm (adjacent knots), and direct comparison of the species size profile with the present samples (taken using mesh sizes from 15 mm) is not possible. Nevertheless, it is clear that M. furnieri could be present in the northern Patos Lagoon and Guaíba Lake during all months of the year, from juveniles to adults, although mostly juveniles occur in southern Guaíba Lake in winter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Lucena et al (1994), from monthly samples taken with a beach seine in southern Guaíba Lake, recorded only two captures of M. furnieri in autumn. In a more-recent sampling program, using surface and bottom gillnets (adjacent knots: 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and 65 mm), Ceni et al (2016) captured M. furnieri in the northern Patos Lagoon in the size range of 10-55 cm (total length). The species was present year-round and was 3-4-fold more abundant from August to October.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Juveniles of M. liza are much more abundant in the estuary (45 individuals 100 m −2 ) than in the freshwater portion of the lagoon (1.2 individuals 100 m −2 ) (Vieira et al, 2010). However, the occurrence of M. liza individuals and even M. liza fisheries in the freshwater portion of the Patos Lagoon is well known (Ceni et al, 2016;Milani & Fontoura, 2007). These results reinforce the idea that species behaviour is more variable than previously thought (Chapman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the freshwater fish species of the Patos Lagoon basin are relatively well known taxonomically, with more than 200 recorded limnetic species (Malabarba, 1989;Reis et al, 2003;Bertaco et al, 2016;Fontoura et al, 2016), information concerning reproductive aspects of these species is still needed. Although recent reviews have treated aspects of the conservation and fishery (Ceni et al, 2016) of the Patos basin, the only general overview of the reproductive biology of fish species was by Marques et al (2007), who estimated the size at first maturity for some dominant species.…”
Section: Original Article Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%