2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10009-006-0001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FSAP/NuSMV-SA Safety Analysis Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An application of model checking and fault tree analysis for the safety analysis of an embedded system is described in [33]. The use of model checking for fault coverage analysis has been proposed in [34,35]. Also efficient symbolic techniques for probabilistic model checking have been developed, e.g.…”
Section: Dynamic Reliability Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application of model checking and fault tree analysis for the safety analysis of an embedded system is described in [33]. The use of model checking for fault coverage analysis has been proposed in [34,35]. Also efficient symbolic techniques for probabilistic model checking have been developed, e.g.…”
Section: Dynamic Reliability Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…component failures. Prominent examples based on this approach include Altarica (Arnold et al, 2000) and FSAP/NuSMV (Bozzano & Villafiorita, 2006). properties.…”
Section: Csa Approach Include Hierarchically Performed Hazards Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual integration of the nominal and the error model, the so-called (fault) model extension, works similarly to the procedure described in [8]. It takes the nominal model and enriches it by the error model specification, thus producing an integrated model which represents both the nominal and the failure behavior.…”
Section: Formal Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COM-PASS methodology relies on the seminal work carried out within the ESACS 2 (Enhanced Safety Assessment for Complex Systems) and ISAAC 3 (Improvement of Safety Activities on Aeronautical Complex systems) projects, two EuropeanUnion-sponsored projects involving various research centers and industries from the avionics sector, and that resulted in the FSAP tool [19]. As advocated in [8], an essential step of the methodology is the decoupling between the nominal behavior and the faulty behavior of the system, that is realized by means of the model-extension step (cf. Section 2.4).…”
Section: Verification Of Safety/dependability Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%