Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2508443.2508446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FTG+PM framework for multi-paradigm modelling

Abstract: In recent years, many new concepts, methodologies, and tools have emerged, which have made Model Driven Engineering (MDE) more usable, precise and automated. We have earlier proposed a conceptual framework, FTG+PM, that acts as a guide for carrying out model transformations, and as a basis for unifying key MDE practices, namely multiparadigm modelling, meta-modelling, and model transformation. The FTG+PM consists of the Formalism Transformation Graph (FTG) and its complement, the Process Model (PM), and charts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already introduced the inaccuracy construct (Section 5.2) to integrate the results of such predictions with IRM-SA. This idea aligns well with research in stochastic hybrid systems, and also complies with our vision to employ Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM) in siCPS [61]. MPM that will allow to work with different types of models (such as physical-world, communication, mechanical, and adaptability models) which would be integrated into a single rich software architecture model (similar to [11]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We have already introduced the inaccuracy construct (Section 5.2) to integrate the results of such predictions with IRM-SA. This idea aligns well with research in stochastic hybrid systems, and also complies with our vision to employ Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM) in siCPS [61]. MPM that will allow to work with different types of models (such as physical-world, communication, mechanical, and adaptability models) which would be integrated into a single rich software architecture model (similar to [11]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In [194,196,216] a Process Model (PM) language is proposed to describe the control and data flow between design activities. To this end, a subset of the Unified Modelling Language (UML) 2.0 activity diagrams are used.…”
Section: Reasoning About Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the join and fork Activity Diagram flow constructs, represented in Figure 9.4 as horizontal bars, allow one to represent concurrent design activities. Corresponding to mega-model principles [19,31,142], the Formalism Transformation Graph (FTG) [194,196,216] is a language that allows one to declare those formalisms and transformations. It models the relations between the different languages using transformations.…”
Section: Control Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will go through the different simulation models created for the power window during the deployment process. More information about the design process of the power window can be found in Mustafiz et al 38…”
Section: The Window Must Start Moving Within 200 Ms Aftermentioning
confidence: 99%