1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb02012.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The function of isolated domains and chimaeric proteins constructed from the transcriptional activators NifA and NtrC of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Abstract: A model for the domain structure of sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activators, based on sequence data, has been tested by examining the function of truncated and chimaeric proteins. Removal of the N-terminal domain of NtrC abolishes transcriptional activation, indicating that this domain is positively required for activator function. Over-expression of this domain as a separate peptide appears to titrate out the phosphorylating activity of NtrB. Removal of the N-terminal domain of NifA reduces activation 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
95
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 for a summary of properties). These results confirm the modular nature of the central catalytic domain of the NIFA protein from K. pneumoniae in that this domain itself and all four fusion proteins containing it (the other two being MBP-NIFA and MBP-central domain) are active in vivo (10,25) and in vitro. This is in contrast to the case for NTRC, a well-studied homolog of NIFA: neither MBP-⌬N-NTRC nor MBP-NTRC-⌬C is active, and the same is true for ⌬N-NTRC and NTRC-⌬C (28,40).…”
Section: P]gtp or [␥-supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Table 1 for a summary of properties). These results confirm the modular nature of the central catalytic domain of the NIFA protein from K. pneumoniae in that this domain itself and all four fusion proteins containing it (the other two being MBP-NIFA and MBP-central domain) are active in vivo (10,25) and in vitro. This is in contrast to the case for NTRC, a well-studied homolog of NIFA: neither MBP-⌬N-NTRC nor MBP-NTRC-⌬C is active, and the same is true for ⌬N-NTRC and NTRC-⌬C (28,40).…”
Section: P]gtp or [␥-supporting
confidence: 70%
“…mechanism, deletions that truncate or remove the receiver domain result in constitutively active proteins (see Doucleff et al 2005). In stark contrast, positively regulated activators like NtrC require the presence of the phosphorylated receiver domain to function in ATPase and transcription activation assays (Drummond et al 1990;Weiss et al 1992a,b;Klose et al 1993). Our structures, together with previous biochemical data showing that the activated receiver domain of one subunit is in contact with the ATPase domain of a second, nonidentical subunit, offer an explanation for the positive mode of regulation in NtrC.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Positive Activation In 54 -Dependent Aaa+ Atpasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells wcre then spun down, resuspended in 50% glycerol/saline phosphate, and stored at -20°C. Small aliquots were plated on Luria-Bertani agar [6] genesis, using template purified by isopycnic centrifugation, as previously described [7]. When degenerate oligonucleotides were employed.…”
Section: Plasmid Construction and Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%