2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-023-00958-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Functional Aspects of Resting EEG Microstates: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
94
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
12
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, while all four of the microstate parameters (GEV, duration, coverage, occurrence) were seen to increase as a function of age (Figure 6), age was only found to significantly contribute to the model for duration and occurrence after multiple comparison corrections were applied. We also note that, while we refer here to the topography with left-to-right configuration as microstate E, in line with other studies (e.g., Baldini et al, 2023;Brechet et al, 2019;Custo et al, 2017;Das et al, 2022;D'Croz-Baron et al, 2019;Ke et al, 2021;Takarae et al, 2022;Tarailis et al, 2021), inconsistent microstate labelling across studies has also seen this microstate labelled as microstate F (see Tarailis et al (2023) for a recent in-depth review of resting-state EEG microstates). As microstate E is relatively newly described, only limited information presently exists on its functional relevance (Tarailis et al, 2023).…”
Section: Age Effects On Microstate Featuressupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, while all four of the microstate parameters (GEV, duration, coverage, occurrence) were seen to increase as a function of age (Figure 6), age was only found to significantly contribute to the model for duration and occurrence after multiple comparison corrections were applied. We also note that, while we refer here to the topography with left-to-right configuration as microstate E, in line with other studies (e.g., Baldini et al, 2023;Brechet et al, 2019;Custo et al, 2017;Das et al, 2022;D'Croz-Baron et al, 2019;Ke et al, 2021;Takarae et al, 2022;Tarailis et al, 2021), inconsistent microstate labelling across studies has also seen this microstate labelled as microstate F (see Tarailis et al (2023) for a recent in-depth review of resting-state EEG microstates). As microstate E is relatively newly described, only limited information presently exists on its functional relevance (Tarailis et al, 2023).…”
Section: Age Effects On Microstate Featuressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Four of the microstate maps obtained for both the eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions strongly resembled the canonical microstates A, B, C, and D previously reported in the literature (Khanna et al, 2015;Michel & Koenig, 2018;Tarailis et al, 2023), while the fifth map resembled the more recently described microstate E (Custo et al, 2017;Das et al, 2022;Ke et al, 2021) (sometimes also referred to as microstate F (Tarailis et al, 2023); Figure 2; scalp field potential data pertaining to each microstate template map is also provided in Table S2). Together, the five microstates explained 69.2% (eyesclosed) and 68.4% (eyes-open) of the total global variance, which is broadly in line with previous reports (Custo et al, 2017;Michel & Koenig, 2018)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The median optimal number of microstate templates, determined using the Krzanowski–Lai criterion, was found to be k=7 across all subjects, within a range of 4 − 15 clusters. Figure 4 displays the topographical maps of each of these seven microstates, which exhibit a strong resemblance to the classical microstate maps (A–F and C ) (Custo et al, 2017; Michel & Koenig, 2018; Tarailis et al, 2023). Additional information and detailed results regarding microstate topographies can be found in section 4 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%