1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(18)30942-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Functional Neural Architecture of Components of Attention in Language Processing Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another piece of evidence for the benefit of character writing on mapping is that our study identified a semantic advantage for character writing for adult learners of Chinese. We found greater activation in bilateral middle/superior temporal gyri for the characterwriting condition than the pinyin-writing condition in the implicit writing task, a region associated with verbal semantic representation and storage [Chou et al, 2006a;Howard et al, 1992;Shaywitz et al, 2001]. Our result is consistent with previous behavioral findings that writing practice is more helpful for semantic tasks than for reading only and typing tasks [Guan et al, 2011].…”
Section: Differences Between the Two Learning Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Another piece of evidence for the benefit of character writing on mapping is that our study identified a semantic advantage for character writing for adult learners of Chinese. We found greater activation in bilateral middle/superior temporal gyri for the characterwriting condition than the pinyin-writing condition in the implicit writing task, a region associated with verbal semantic representation and storage [Chou et al, 2006a;Howard et al, 1992;Shaywitz et al, 2001]. Our result is consistent with previous behavioral findings that writing practice is more helpful for semantic tasks than for reading only and typing tasks [Guan et al, 2011].…”
Section: Differences Between the Two Learning Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with previous observations (Shaywitz et al, 2001), lexical discrimination was less accurate and slower during the auditory relative to the visual simple and selective attention conditions (main effect of modality: performance accuracy: b ¼ À0.05, t ¼ À2.2, po0.03; reaction time: b ¼ 234.0, t ¼ 6.8, po0.0001). A significant modality by prenatal exposure to maternal smoking by adolescent smoking effect was observed on performance accuracy (b ¼ À0.1, t ¼ À2.0, po0.05; Figure 2a).…”
Section: Effects Of Gender Prenatal Exposure To Maternal Smoking Ansupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Plots of the percent signal change data revealed that, across exposure groups, activation of these regions was greater during the auditory conditions than during the visual conditions, consistent with earlier comparisons of auditory and visual attention demonstrating the importance of these regions for auditory attention (Saito et al, 2005;Shaywitz et al, 2001). Post hoc analyses indicated that during the auditory conditions, activation of right superior temporal gyrus was significantly greater in all exposure groups relative to subjects with neither prenatal nor adolescent exposure, whereas activation of left and right lingual gyrus was significantly greater in subjects with prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke alone than in subjects with neither prenatal nor adolescent exposure.…”
Section: Effects Of Prenatal Exposure To Maternal Smoking and Adolescsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations