The Functional Roles of the Amygdala and Prefrontal Cortex in Processing Uncertainty

Abstract

Decisions under uncertainty distinguish between those made under risk (known probabilities) and those made under ambiguity (unknown probabilities). Despite widespread interest in decisions under uncertainty and the successful documentation that these distinct psychological constructs profoundly—and differentially—impact behavior, research has not been able to systematically converge on which brain regions are functionally involved in processing risk and ambiguity. We merge a lesion approach with computational modeling and simultaneous measurement of the arousal response to investigate the impact the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC), and amygdala have on decisions under uncertainty. Results reveal that the lPFC acts as a unitary system for processing uncertainty: Lesions to this region disrupted the relationship between arousal and choice, broadly increasing both risk and ambiguity seeking. In contrast, the mPFC and amygdala appeared to play no role in processing risk, and the mPFC only had a tenuous relationship with ambiguous uncertainty. Together, these findings reveal that only the lPFC plays a global role in processing the highly aversive nature of uncertainty.

Thinking fast or slow? Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals stronger connectivity when experienced neurologists diagnose ambiguous cases

“…The main difference in neural activity between Type 1 and Type 2 cases was found to concern increased connectivity between the frontal and parietal cortex, anterior and posterior temporal cortex and parietal–cerebellum connection. This connectivity finding fits well into a wider body of literature regarding the detection, processing and resolution of uncertainty ( Yoshida and Ishii, 2006 ; Goñi et al , 2011 ; FeldmanHall et al , 2019 ). The lateral prefrontal cortex has been shown to be active in redecision processing (revisiting one’s initial decisions) and to be scaled with decision uncertainty reduction and correlated with individual accuracy changes in a rule-based decision-making task ( Qiu et al , 2018 ).…”

Developmental Dyslexia: Environment Matters

“…Alterations in neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity were documented in HPA axis-associated brain regions (frontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala), in cases of chronic ELS [78][79][80]. Such regions, that mediate decision making in the context of the fight-flight response, are also targets of stress hormones [81]. Initially, deficits and abnormality in neuronal migration in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala were proposed as causal factors for DD etiopathology.…”

An Evolutionary Perspective of Dyslexia, Stress, and Brain Network Homeostasis

“…However, even acute moderate stress may impair higher cognitive functions ( Elzinga and Roelofs, 2005 ; Roozendaal et al, 2009 ; van Marie et al, 2009 ). Negative long-lasting physiological and behavioral consequences begin with persistent anxiety, especially in ambiguous risky environments ( FeldmanHall et al, 2019 ). And, at the more serious end of the spectrum in vulnerable individuals may lead to poor health, psychosis and externalizing behaviors ( McGowen and Mathews, 2018 ).…”