2017
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The functional syndrome: linking individual trait variability to ecosystem functioning

Abstract: Phenotypic variability is increasingly assessed through functional response and effect traits, which provide a mechanistic framework for investigating how an organism responds to varying ecological factors and how these responses affect ecosystem functioning. Covariation between response and effect traits has been poorly examined at the intraspecific level, thus hampering progress in understanding how phenotypic variability alters the role of organisms in ecosystems. Using a multi-trait approach and a nine-mon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chelae are important organs involved in multiple ecological functions of crayfish (e.g., predator–prey and competitor interactions, feeding behavior, biological engineering; Gherardi, Acquistapace, & Barbaresi, ; Matsuzaki, Usio, Takamura, & Washitani, ) and are known to display intraspecific morphological variations (Claussen, Gerald, Kotcher, & Miskell, ; Malavé, Styga, & Clotfelter, ). In the studied system, previous investigations have revealed the existence of intraspecific variability among P. clarkii populations in terms of body morphology (Evangelista, Cucherousset, Olden, & Lecerf, ), trophic ecology (Jackson et al, ), and ecosystem impacts (Alp et al, ; Evangelista, Lecerf, & Cucherousset, ), as well as the presence of within‐population phenotypic variability (Raffard et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Chelae are important organs involved in multiple ecological functions of crayfish (e.g., predator–prey and competitor interactions, feeding behavior, biological engineering; Gherardi, Acquistapace, & Barbaresi, ; Matsuzaki, Usio, Takamura, & Washitani, ) and are known to display intraspecific morphological variations (Claussen, Gerald, Kotcher, & Miskell, ; Malavé, Styga, & Clotfelter, ). In the studied system, previous investigations have revealed the existence of intraspecific variability among P. clarkii populations in terms of body morphology (Evangelista, Cucherousset, Olden, & Lecerf, ), trophic ecology (Jackson et al, ), and ecosystem impacts (Alp et al, ; Evangelista, Lecerf, & Cucherousset, ), as well as the presence of within‐population phenotypic variability (Raffard et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The various biological mechanisms-such as pleiotropy or allometry-underlying the links among traits might therefore be modulated differently among populations, resulting in difference of syndromes (Peiman & Robinson, 2017). Hence, it would be worth further investigating the biological mechanisms driving trait covariations to better appraise the variability of functional syndromes (Killen, Atkinson, & Glazier, 2010;Raffard et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, community ecologists have investigated how covariations in functional traits, measured at the community level, can affect ecosystem functioning (Díaz et al, 2016;Lavorel & Garnier, 2002). More recently, it has been demonstrated that functional trait covariations also occur within species, forming a so-called functional syndrome (Raffard et al, 2017). Functional syndromes have been shown to exist in several species (e.g., Defossez, Pellissier, & Rasmann, 2018;Raffard et al, 2017), but the variability of these syndromes across populations and environmental conditions remains unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) and ecosystem processes (Raffard et al. ). For example, divergence in foraging traits of predatory alewife alters body size and species richness of their zooplankton prey (Palkovacs and Post ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%